Withholding medical treatment from the severely demented patient. Decisional processes and cost implications

Nelda Wray, B. Brody, T. Bayer, E. Boisaubin, F. Davila, R. Dresser, J. K. Dunn, H. T. Engelhardt, H. Haley, J. D. Hamilton, S. Niefield, E. Shelp, J. Scheurich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations


We performed an observational study to determine the prevalence of severe dementia in a general medicine unit, the categories of acute medical care provided to these patients, the process by which treatment decisions are made, and their cost implications. The prevalence of severe dementia was 4.4%. The patients from whom some form of acute medical care was withheld (26 [45.6%] of 57) were more severely ill at admission and had a mortality rate five times higher than those who received full care. Physicians cited family wishes in 75.9% of the decisions to limit care but in only 10.9% of the decisions to give full care. The only differences in charges incurred were due to differential mortality rates in individuals from whom care was withheld. We recommented that hospitals develop and implement protocols for decision making in the care of the severely demented to promote open discussions among providers and families and to increase family contributions to decision making. We believe that the extension of this consultative approach to decisions involving severely demented patients may have the virtue of combining more humane care with more cost-effective care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1980-1984
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Issue number9
StatePublished - 1988

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Withholding medical treatment from the severely demented patient. Decisional processes and cost implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this