What is the evidence for use dependent learning after stroke?

Thomas A. Kent; Devon G. Rutherford; Joshua I. Breier; Andrew C. Papanicoloau

doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.534925

What is the evidence for use dependent learning after stroke?

Thomas A. Kent, Devon G. Rutherford, Joshua I. Breier, Andrew C. Papanicoloau

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	S139-S140
Journal	Stroke
Volume	40
Issue number	3 SUPPL. 1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.534925
State	Published - Mar 2009

Keywords

Animal models
MEG
Stroke recovery
Synapse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Clinical Neurology
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Access to Document

10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.534925

Cite this

@article{ceb95fcda6d54e53a38fe5602f3a5eab,

title = "What is the evidence for use dependent learning after stroke?",

keywords = "Animal models, MEG, Stroke recovery, Synapse",

author = "Kent, \{Thomas A.\} and Rutherford, \{Devon G.\} and Breier, \{Joshua I.\} and Papanicoloau, \{Andrew C.\}",

year = "2009",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.534925",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "40",

pages = "S139--S140",

journal = "Stroke",

issn = "0039-2499",