Abstract

In 1996, a survey of the members of the American Academy of Neurology revealed the following facts and opinions: (1) On an average month, each respondent ordered 15 computed tomography, 22 magnetic resonance imaging, 13 ultrasound and 1 single-photon emission computerized tomography studies. (2) Most respondents did not read their own studies for reimbursement, but relied on their own reading for patient management. (3) Respondents felt that neurologists are appropriate specialists to read imaging studies; however, they favored certification for neurologists credentialed in neuroimaging. (4) Organized neurology should provide certification in neuroimaging for neurologists with appropriate training and defend their right and their need to practice neuroimaging, including endovascular procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-42
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Neuroimaging
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1999

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Neuroimaging
  • Practice management
  • Ultrasound
  • X-ray computed tomography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'What do neurologists think about their role in neuroimaging training and practice?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this