TY - JOUR
T1 - Vulnerability and agency in research participants' daily lives and the research encounter
T2 - A qualitative case study of participants taking part in scrub typhus research in northern Thailand
AU - Greer, Rachel C.
AU - Kanthawang, Nipaphan
AU - Roest, Jennifer
AU - Wangrangsimakul, Tri
AU - Parker, Michael
AU - Kelley, Maureen
AU - Cheah, Phaik Yeong
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by a Wellcome Trust and MRC Newton Fund Collaborative Award (200344/Z/15/Z), a Wellcome Trust Strategic Award (096527) and a Wellcome Trust Centre award (203132). The Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit is funded by the Wellcome Trust (220211/Z/20/Z). The funders had no role in the study design, analysis or manuscript preparation.
Funding Information:
Funding:ThisstudywassupportedbyaWellcome TrustandMRCNewtonFundCollaborativeAward (200344/Z/15/Z),aWellcomeTrustStrategic Award(096527)andaWellcomeTrustCentre award(203132).TheMahidolOxfordTropical MedicineResearchUnitisfundedbytheWellcome Trust(220211/Z/20/Z).Thefundershadnorolein thestudydesign,analysisormanuscript preparation.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2023 Greer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Background Researchers have a responsibility to protect all participants, especially vulnerable participants, from harm. Vulnerability is increasingly understood to be context specific, yet limited guidance is available regarding the vulnerability and agency of research participants in different cultural settings. This study aims to explore research participants' daily vulnerability and agency, and how these interact with participants' research experiences in their own words. Researchers' views and responses were also explored. Methods A qualitative study was conducted around two scrub typhus research studies in northern Thailand. A thematic analysis was carried out on 42 semi-structured interviews with research participants, their families, researchers and key informants. Results The majority of the research participants belonged to a hill tribe ethnic minority group. Common challenges were related to Thai language barriers, travel difficulties, uncertain legal status, unstable employment, lack of education and healthcare. We did not identify new vulnerabilities but we found that the extent of these vulnerabilities might be underestimated or even hidden from researchers in some cases. Despite these challenges people demonstrated agency in their daily lives and were often motivated and supported in this by family members. The majority of perceived research benefits were related to healthcare and gaining knowledge, while attending follow-up visits could be a burden for some. Conclusions Our approach to research in culturally and socioeconomically diverse settings should be more responsive to participants' specific vulnerabilities and abilities evidenced in their daily life, rather than attributing vulnerability on the basis of membership of pre-defined 'vulnerable groups'. Researchers need to be aware and responsive towards the challenges participants face locally in order to minimise the burdens of research participation whilst allowing participants to benefit from research.
AB - Background Researchers have a responsibility to protect all participants, especially vulnerable participants, from harm. Vulnerability is increasingly understood to be context specific, yet limited guidance is available regarding the vulnerability and agency of research participants in different cultural settings. This study aims to explore research participants' daily vulnerability and agency, and how these interact with participants' research experiences in their own words. Researchers' views and responses were also explored. Methods A qualitative study was conducted around two scrub typhus research studies in northern Thailand. A thematic analysis was carried out on 42 semi-structured interviews with research participants, their families, researchers and key informants. Results The majority of the research participants belonged to a hill tribe ethnic minority group. Common challenges were related to Thai language barriers, travel difficulties, uncertain legal status, unstable employment, lack of education and healthcare. We did not identify new vulnerabilities but we found that the extent of these vulnerabilities might be underestimated or even hidden from researchers in some cases. Despite these challenges people demonstrated agency in their daily lives and were often motivated and supported in this by family members. The majority of perceived research benefits were related to healthcare and gaining knowledge, while attending follow-up visits could be a burden for some. Conclusions Our approach to research in culturally and socioeconomically diverse settings should be more responsive to participants' specific vulnerabilities and abilities evidenced in their daily life, rather than attributing vulnerability on the basis of membership of pre-defined 'vulnerable groups'. Researchers need to be aware and responsive towards the challenges participants face locally in order to minimise the burdens of research participation whilst allowing participants to benefit from research.
KW - Humans
KW - Ethnicity
KW - Thailand
KW - Scrub Typhus
KW - Minority Groups
KW - Qualitative Research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146895100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146895100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0280056
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0280056
M3 - Article
C2 - 36696400
AN - SCOPUS:85146895100
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 18
SP - e0280056
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 1
M1 - e0280056
ER -