Vouchers for future kidney transplants to overcome "chronological incompatibility" between living donors and recipients

Jeffrey L. Veale, Alexander M. Capron, Nima Nassiri, Gabriel Danovitch, H. Albin Gritsch, Amy Waterman, Joseph Del Pizzo, Jim C. Hu, Marek Pycia, Suzanne McGuire, Marian Charlton, Sandip Kapur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

The waiting list for kidney transplantation is long. The creation of "vouchers" for future kidney transplants enables living donation to occur when optimal for the donor and transplantation to occur later, when and if needed by the recipient. Methods. The donation of a kidney at a time that is optimal for the donor generates a "voucher" that only a specified recipient may redeem later when needed. The voucher provides the recipient with priority in being matched with a living donor from the end of a future transplantation chain. Besides its use in persons of advancing age with a limited window for donation, vouchers remove a disincentive to kidney donation, namely, a reluctance to donate now lest one's family member should need a transplant in the future.Results.We describe the first three voucher cases, in which advancing age might otherwise have deprived the donors the opportunity to provide a kidney to a family member. These 3 voucher donations functioned in a nondirected fashion and triggered 25 transplants through kidney paired donation across the United States.Conclusions. The provision of a voucher to potential recipients whose need for a transplant makes them "chronologically incompatible" with their donors may increase the number of living donor transplants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2115-2119
Number of pages5
JournalTransplantation
Volume101
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Vouchers for future kidney transplants to overcome "chronological incompatibility" between living donors and recipients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this