TY - JOUR
T1 - Venous thrombosis in coupled versus sutured microvascular anastomoses
AU - Yap, Lok H.
AU - Constantinides, Joannis
AU - Butler, Charles E.
PY - 2006/12/1
Y1 - 2006/12/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: The anastomotic coupling device (ACD) is currently used for microsurgical venous anastomoses as an alternative to sutures and can reduce anastomotic time. METHODS: We reviewed the microsurgical procedures performed at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center over a 40-month period. Procedures were performed for elective reconstruction of the breast, head or neck, or extremities after tumor excision. Thrombosis and ultimate flap salvage rates were compared between cases using ACDs and those using sutures for the venous anastomoses. RESULTS: Seven hundred twenty-three free flaps were included in the study. There were no intraoperative technical complications using the ACD. Overall, the venous thrombosis rates were not significantly different between the ACD (1.4%, 2/139 cases) and sutured (3.3%, 19/584 cases) groups. Salvage rates following venous thrombosis were not significantly different for venous anastomoses performed with an ACD (50%, 1 of 2 cases salvaged) compared with venous anastomoses performed with sutures (68.4%, 13 of 19 cases salvaged). CONCLUSION: The ACD is a useful alternative to sutured venous anastomoses that can reduce anastomotic time while achieving similar patency rates.
AB - BACKGROUND: The anastomotic coupling device (ACD) is currently used for microsurgical venous anastomoses as an alternative to sutures and can reduce anastomotic time. METHODS: We reviewed the microsurgical procedures performed at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center over a 40-month period. Procedures were performed for elective reconstruction of the breast, head or neck, or extremities after tumor excision. Thrombosis and ultimate flap salvage rates were compared between cases using ACDs and those using sutures for the venous anastomoses. RESULTS: Seven hundred twenty-three free flaps were included in the study. There were no intraoperative technical complications using the ACD. Overall, the venous thrombosis rates were not significantly different between the ACD (1.4%, 2/139 cases) and sutured (3.3%, 19/584 cases) groups. Salvage rates following venous thrombosis were not significantly different for venous anastomoses performed with an ACD (50%, 1 of 2 cases salvaged) compared with venous anastomoses performed with sutures (68.4%, 13 of 19 cases salvaged). CONCLUSION: The ACD is a useful alternative to sutured venous anastomoses that can reduce anastomotic time while achieving similar patency rates.
KW - Anastomosis
KW - Microsurgery
KW - Postoperative complications
KW - Reconstructive surgical procedures
KW - Surgical flaps
KW - Thrombosis
KW - Vascular patency
KW - Vascular surgical procedures
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751314744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751314744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.sap.0000229958.57126.21
DO - 10.1097/01.sap.0000229958.57126.21
M3 - Article
C2 - 17122555
AN - SCOPUS:33751314744
SN - 0148-7043
VL - 57
SP - 666
EP - 669
JO - Annals of plastic surgery
JF - Annals of plastic surgery
IS - 6
ER -