TY - JOUR
T1 - Venous Sinus Stenting for Low Pressure Gradient Stenoses in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
AU - Inam, Mehmet Enes
AU - Martinez-Gutierrez, Juan Carlos
AU - Kole, Matthew J.
AU - Sanchez, Francisco
AU - Lekka, Elvira
AU - Truong, Van Thi Thanh
AU - Lopez-Rivera, Victor
AU - Sheriff, Faheem G.
AU - Zima, Laura A.
AU - Pedroza, Claudia
AU - Tang, Rosa
AU - Adesina, Ore Ofe
AU - Engstrom, Allison
AU - Sheth, Sunil A.
AU - Chen, Peng Roc
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Congress of Neurological Surgeons. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is frequently treated with venous sinus stenosis stenting with high success rates. Patient selection has been driven almost exclusively by identification of supraphysiological venous pressure gradients across stenotic regions based on theoretical assessment of likelihood of response. OBJECTIVE: To explore the possibility of benefit in low venous pressure gradient patients. METHODS: Using a single-center, prospectively maintained registry of patients with IIH undergoing venous stenting, we defined treatment groups by gradient pressures of ≤4, 5 to 8, and >8 mmHg based on the most frequently previously published thresholds for stenting. Baseline demographics, clinical, and neuro-ophthalmological outcomes (including optical coherence tomography and Humphrey visual fields) were compared. RESULTS: Among 53 patients, the mean age was 32 years and 70% female with a mean body mass index was 36 kg/m 2. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The mean change in lumbar puncture opening pressure at 6 months poststenting was similar between the 3 groups (≤4, 5-8, and >8 mmHg; 13.4, 12.9, and 12.4 cmH 2 O, P =.47). Papilledema improvement was observed across groups at 6 months (100, 93, and 86, P =.7) as were all clinical symptoms. The mean changes in optical coherence tomography retinal nerve fiber layer (-30, -54, and -104, P =.5) and mean deviation in Humphrey visual fields (60, 64, and 67, P =.5) at 6 weeks were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Patients with IH with low venous pressure gradient venous sinus stenosis seem to benefit equally from venous stenting compared with their higher gradient counterparts. Re-evaluation of our restrictive criteria for this potentially vision sparing intervention is warranted. Future prospective confirmatory studies are needed.
AB - BACKGROUND: Medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is frequently treated with venous sinus stenosis stenting with high success rates. Patient selection has been driven almost exclusively by identification of supraphysiological venous pressure gradients across stenotic regions based on theoretical assessment of likelihood of response. OBJECTIVE: To explore the possibility of benefit in low venous pressure gradient patients. METHODS: Using a single-center, prospectively maintained registry of patients with IIH undergoing venous stenting, we defined treatment groups by gradient pressures of ≤4, 5 to 8, and >8 mmHg based on the most frequently previously published thresholds for stenting. Baseline demographics, clinical, and neuro-ophthalmological outcomes (including optical coherence tomography and Humphrey visual fields) were compared. RESULTS: Among 53 patients, the mean age was 32 years and 70% female with a mean body mass index was 36 kg/m 2. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The mean change in lumbar puncture opening pressure at 6 months poststenting was similar between the 3 groups (≤4, 5-8, and >8 mmHg; 13.4, 12.9, and 12.4 cmH 2 O, P =.47). Papilledema improvement was observed across groups at 6 months (100, 93, and 86, P =.7) as were all clinical symptoms. The mean changes in optical coherence tomography retinal nerve fiber layer (-30, -54, and -104, P =.5) and mean deviation in Humphrey visual fields (60, 64, and 67, P =.5) at 6 weeks were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Patients with IH with low venous pressure gradient venous sinus stenosis seem to benefit equally from venous stenting compared with their higher gradient counterparts. Re-evaluation of our restrictive criteria for this potentially vision sparing intervention is warranted. Future prospective confirmatory studies are needed.
KW - Intracranial pressure
KW - Stenosis
KW - Stenting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140144108&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85140144108&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1227/neu.0000000000002095
DO - 10.1227/neu.0000000000002095
M3 - Article
C2 - 35960743
AN - SCOPUS:85140144108
SN - 0148-396X
VL - 91
SP - 734
EP - 740
JO - Neurosurgery
JF - Neurosurgery
IS - 5
ER -