Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Valve Underexpansion and Clinical Outcomes With ACURATE neo2: Findings From the ACURATE IDE Trial

Raj R. Makkar, Tarun Chakravarty, Aakriti Gupta, Osama Soliman, Eric Gnall, Ravi K. Ramana, Basel Ramlawi, Pantelis Diamantouros, Srinivasa Potluri, Neal S. Kleiman, Sanjay Samy, Andrew Rassi, Pradeep Yadav, Vinod Thourani, Steven Yakubov, Chris Frawley, Dhairya Patel, Samir Kapadia, Aaron Chalekian, Rodrigo ModoloJanarthanan Sathananthan, Won Keun Kim, Michael J. Reardon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: In the ACURATE IDE (Safety and Effectiveness Study of ACURATE Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement) randomized controlled trial, ACURATE neo2 failed to show noninferiority to commercially available balloon-expandable (SAPIEN 3/3 Ultra) and self-expanding (Evolut R/PRO/PRO+/FX) valves for the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke, or rehospitalization at 1 year. A retrospective investigation was undertaken to evaluate potential factors contributing to these outcomes. Objectives: The goal of this study was to assess the impact of ACURATE neo2 valve expansion on clinical outcomes in the ACURATE IDE trial. Methods: Post hoc case review identified angulated (nonparallel) commissure posts in a few implanted ACURATE neo2 valves, indicating valve underexpansion. Procedural angiograms for all ACURATE neo2 valves implanted in the trial's main randomized cohort (n = 752) were inspected by an independent core laboratory. An exploratory analysis was performed to evaluate the association between valve expansion and clinical outcomes. Results: Of the 624 patients who underwent implantation with the ACURATE neo2 and had evaluable procedural angiograms, 135 (21.6%) had underexpanded valves. Greater aortic valve leaflet and annulus calcification at baseline was independently associated with ACURATE neo2 valve underexpansion (OR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.27-2.91; P = 0.002). Procedural techniques, including frequency of predilation (100% in both groups) and postdilation (26.7% vs 25.2%; P = 0.72), and balloon sizing did not differ between the underexpanded and expanded valve groups. ACURATE neo2 underexpansion was associated with a higher 1-year rate of death, stroke, or rehospitalization (underexpanded: 18.7%; expanded: 11.8%; P = 0.04), which was confirmed in a multivariable analysis (HR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.27-2.91; P = 0.002). Conclusions: Underexpansion of the ACURATE neo2 valve in the ACURATE IDE study was associated with a higher risk of the composite endpoint of death, stroke, or rehospitalization. Given the post hoc nature of these analyses, the study findings should be considered hypothesis generating. Whether achieving optimal valve expansion of the ACURATE neo2 valve with improvement in device design and procedural iterations will translate into improved clinical outcomes remains to be studied.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)225-238
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume86
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 29 2025

Keywords

  • ACURATE IDE
  • ACURATE neo2
  • TAVR
  • aortic stenosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Valve Underexpansion and Clinical Outcomes With ACURATE neo2: Findings From the ACURATE IDE Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this