TY - JOUR
T1 - Utility of routine postoperative visit after appendectomy and cholecystectomy with evaluation of mobile technology access in an urban safety net population
AU - Chen, Diane W.
AU - Davis, Rachel W.
AU - Balentine, Courtney J.
AU - Scott, Aaron R.
AU - Gao, Yue
AU - Tapia, Nicole M.
AU - Berger, David H.
AU - Suliburk, James W.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded in part through internal seed funding from the Baylor College of Medicine “Advancing Clinical Excellence” pilot grants.
PY - 2014/8
Y1 - 2014/8
N2 - Background The value of routine postoperative visits after general surgery remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of routine postoperative visits after appendectomy and cholecystectomy and to determine access to mobile technology as an alternative platform for follow-up. Methods Retrospective review of 219 appendectomies and 200 cholecystectomies performed at a safety net hospital. One patient underwent both surgeries. Patient demographics, duration of clinic visit, and need for additional imaging, tests or readmissions were recorded. Access to mobile technology was surveyed by a validated questionnaire. Results Of 418 patients, 84% percent completed a postoperative visit. At follow-up, 58 patients (14%) required 70 interventions, including staple removal (16, 23%), suture removal (4, 6%), drain removal (8, 11%), additional follow-up (20, 28%), medication action (16, 21%), additional imaging (3, 4%), and readmission (1, 1%). Occupational paperwork (62) and nonsurgical clinic referrals (28) were also performed. Average check-in to check-out time was 100 ± 54 min per patient. One intervention was performed for every 7.8 h of time in the clinic. Additionally, 88% of the surveyed population reported access to cell phone technology, and 69% of patients <40 y had smartphone access. Conclusions Routine in-person follow-up after surgery consumes significant time and resources for patients and healthcare systems but has little impact on patient care. Most of the work done in the clinic is administrative and could be completed using mobile technology, which is pervasive in our population.
AB - Background The value of routine postoperative visits after general surgery remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of routine postoperative visits after appendectomy and cholecystectomy and to determine access to mobile technology as an alternative platform for follow-up. Methods Retrospective review of 219 appendectomies and 200 cholecystectomies performed at a safety net hospital. One patient underwent both surgeries. Patient demographics, duration of clinic visit, and need for additional imaging, tests or readmissions were recorded. Access to mobile technology was surveyed by a validated questionnaire. Results Of 418 patients, 84% percent completed a postoperative visit. At follow-up, 58 patients (14%) required 70 interventions, including staple removal (16, 23%), suture removal (4, 6%), drain removal (8, 11%), additional follow-up (20, 28%), medication action (16, 21%), additional imaging (3, 4%), and readmission (1, 1%). Occupational paperwork (62) and nonsurgical clinic referrals (28) were also performed. Average check-in to check-out time was 100 ± 54 min per patient. One intervention was performed for every 7.8 h of time in the clinic. Additionally, 88% of the surveyed population reported access to cell phone technology, and 69% of patients <40 y had smartphone access. Conclusions Routine in-person follow-up after surgery consumes significant time and resources for patients and healthcare systems but has little impact on patient care. Most of the work done in the clinic is administrative and could be completed using mobile technology, which is pervasive in our population.
KW - Appendectomy
KW - Cholecystectomy
KW - Electronic communication
KW - Mobile
KW - Mobile health
KW - Quality follow-up
KW - Technology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904269742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904269742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2014.04.028
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2014.04.028
M3 - Article
C2 - 24880202
AN - SCOPUS:84904269742
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 190
SP - 478
EP - 483
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
IS - 2
ER -