Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Use of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Individuals With Elevated Lipoprotein(a): A Multicohort Study

Harpreet S. Bhatia, Yihang Fan, Gourisree Dharmavaram, Alexander C. Razavi, Michael Y. Tsai, Mattheus Ramsis, Ehtisham Mahmud, Michael Wilkinson, Pam Taub, Khurram Nasir, Michael J. Blaha, Nathan D. Wong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The utility of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring in individuals with elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk assessment is currently unclear given the propensity of Lp(a) toward noncalcified plaque. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to evaluate the interaction between elevated Lp(a) (>50 mg/dL) and CAC score, and the association of Lp(a) with ASCVD risk across strata of CAC. METHODS: A pooled cohort of participants without known ASCVD from 4 U.S.-based prospective cohort studies with baseline Lp(a) and CAC measurements was used. The association between elevated Lp(a) across CAC strata and incident ASCVD (myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization) was evaluated in multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: The study included 11,319 participants (mean age 56 years, 54% women) with 1,569 incident ASCVD events over 14.8 year mean follow-up. Lp(a) >50 mg/dL (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.09-1.41) and CAC >0 (HR: 2.44; 95% CI: 2.14-2.77) were independently associated with ASCVD risk (P interaction = 0.80). Among individuals with CAC = 0, ASCVD incidence rates were low overall, but higher with Lp(a) >50 mg/dL vs ≤50 mg/dL (4.9 vs 3.8/1,000 person-years, HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.01-1.60). Among those with CAC >0, increased risk was again noted with elevated Lp(a) (21.2 vs 18.2/1,000 person-years, HR: 3.03; 95% CI: 2.52-3.64). Similar results were observed when examining further CAC strata with the greatest risk noted with both CAC ≥300 and Lp(a) >50 mg/dL (HR: 6.12; 95% CI: 4.80-7.81). Consistent results were noted by age and sex with greater absolute risk in general among individuals >50 years of age and men. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated Lp(a) is associated with higher relative risk across CAC strata, including CAC of 0. Among individuals with CAC of 0, absolute event rates remain low even when Lp(a) is elevated. CAC scoring remains a powerful tool for risk assessment among individuals with elevated Lp(a).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2864-2872
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume87
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - May 26 2026

Keywords

  • coronary artery calcium
  • lipids
  • lipoprotein(a)
  • prevention
  • risk factors
  • Prospective Studies
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Risk Factors
  • Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology
  • Male
  • Vascular Calcification/blood
  • Lipoprotein(a)/blood
  • Calcium/metabolism
  • United States/epidemiology
  • Female
  • Risk Assessment/methods
  • Aged
  • Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging
  • Cohort Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Individuals With Elevated Lipoprotein(a): A Multicohort Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this