TY - JOUR
T1 - Twelve-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration
AU - Busbee, Brandon G.
AU - Ho, Allen C.
AU - Brown, David M.
AU - Heier, Jeffrey S.
AU - Suñer, Ivan J.
AU - Li, Zhengrong
AU - Rubio, Roman G.
AU - Lai, Phillip
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have made the following disclosure(s): B.G.B. has served as a consultant for Alimera, Elan, Genentech, Synergetics, and Thrombogenics; has received research funding from Genentech; is a member of the speakers bureau for Genentech and Regeneron; and has received royalties from AKORN. A.C.H. has served as a consultant for Alcon, Allergan, Centocor/Johnson & Johnson, Genentech, Merck, NeoVista, Ophthotech, Oraya, Paloma, PRN, QLT, Regeneron, and Thrombogenics; has received research funding from Alcon, Allergan, Genentech, National Eye Institute/National Institutes of Health, NeoVista, Ophthotech, Oraya, PRN, QLT, Regeneron, and Second Sight; and is a member of the speakers bureau for Alcon, Genentech, and Regeneron. D.M.B. has served as a consultant for Alcon, Alimera, Allergan, Genentech, Novartis, Regeneron, and Thrombogenics; has received research funding from Abbott, Alcon, Alimera, Allergan, Eli Lilly, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Ophthotech, Novartis, Regeneron, and Thrombogenics; and is a member of the speakers bureau for Genentech and Regeneron. J.S.H. has served as a consultant for Acucela, Allergan, Bayer, Forsight, Fovea, Genentech, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, LPath, Neovista, Oraya, Paloma, QLT, Quark, and Regeneron; and has received research funding from Alcon, Alimera, Allergan, Fovea, Genentech, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Neovista, Neurotech, Novartis, Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston, Ophthotech, Paloma, and Regeneron. I.J.S. has served as a consultant for Genentech, Eyetech, Regeneron, and Thrombogenics; has received research funding from Genentech; is a member of the speakers bureau for Genentech, Optos, and Regeneron; and is a board member of Optos. Z.L., R.G.R., and P.L. are employees of Genentech. Support for third-party writing assistance for this manuscript provided by Linda Merkel, PhD, and Michelle Kelly, PhD, of UBC-Envision Group, and was provided by Genentech, Inc.
PY - 2013/5/1
Y1 - 2013/5/1
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the 12-month efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg administered monthly and on an as-needed (PRN) basis in treatment-naïve patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD). Design: A 24-month, phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-masked, dose-response study. Participants: Patients aged ≥50 years with subfoveal wet AMD. Methods: Patients (n = 1098) were randomized to receive ranibizumab 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg intravitreal injections administered monthly or on a PRN basis after 3 monthly loading doses. Main Outcome Measures: The primary efficacy end point was the mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 12. Key secondary end points included the mean number of ranibizumab injections, the mean change from baseline in central foveal thickness (CFT) over time, and the proportion of patients who gained ≥15 letters of BCVA. Unless otherwise specified, end point analyses were performed using the last-observation-carried-forward method to impute missing data. Results: At month 12, the mean change from baseline in BCVA for the 4 groups was +10.1 letters (0.5 mg monthly), +8.2 letters (0.5 mg PRN), +9.2 letters (2.0 mg monthly), and +8.6 letters (2.0 mg PRN). The proportion of patients who gained ≥15 letters from baseline at month 12 in the 4 groups was 34.5%, 30.2%, 36.1%, and 33.0%, respectively. The mean change from baseline in CFT at month 12 in the 4 groups was -172.0 μm, -161.2 μm, -163.3 μm, and -172.4 μm, respectively. The mean number of injections was 7.7 and 6.9 for the 0.5-mg PRN and 2.0-mg PRN groups, respectively. Ocular and systemic safety profiles were consistent with previous ranibizumab trials in AMD and comparable between groups. Conclusions: At month 12, the ranibizumab 2.0 mg monthly group did not meet the prespecified superiority comparison and the ranibizumab 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg PRN groups did not meet the prespecified noninferiority (NI) comparison. However, all treatment groups demonstrated clinically meaningful visual improvement (+8.2 to +10.1 letters) and improved anatomic outcomes, with the PRN groups requiring approximately 4 fewer injections (6.9-7.7) than the monthly groups (11.2-11.3). No new safety events were observed despite a 4-fold dose escalation in the study. The pHase III, double-masked, multicenter, randomized, Active treatment-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg Ranibizumab administered monthly or on an as-needed Basis (PRN) in patients with subfoveal neOvasculaR age-related macular degeneration (HARBOR) study confirmed that ranibizumab 0.5 mg dosed monthly provides optimum results in patients with wet AMD.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the 12-month efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg administered monthly and on an as-needed (PRN) basis in treatment-naïve patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD). Design: A 24-month, phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-masked, dose-response study. Participants: Patients aged ≥50 years with subfoveal wet AMD. Methods: Patients (n = 1098) were randomized to receive ranibizumab 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg intravitreal injections administered monthly or on a PRN basis after 3 monthly loading doses. Main Outcome Measures: The primary efficacy end point was the mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 12. Key secondary end points included the mean number of ranibizumab injections, the mean change from baseline in central foveal thickness (CFT) over time, and the proportion of patients who gained ≥15 letters of BCVA. Unless otherwise specified, end point analyses were performed using the last-observation-carried-forward method to impute missing data. Results: At month 12, the mean change from baseline in BCVA for the 4 groups was +10.1 letters (0.5 mg monthly), +8.2 letters (0.5 mg PRN), +9.2 letters (2.0 mg monthly), and +8.6 letters (2.0 mg PRN). The proportion of patients who gained ≥15 letters from baseline at month 12 in the 4 groups was 34.5%, 30.2%, 36.1%, and 33.0%, respectively. The mean change from baseline in CFT at month 12 in the 4 groups was -172.0 μm, -161.2 μm, -163.3 μm, and -172.4 μm, respectively. The mean number of injections was 7.7 and 6.9 for the 0.5-mg PRN and 2.0-mg PRN groups, respectively. Ocular and systemic safety profiles were consistent with previous ranibizumab trials in AMD and comparable between groups. Conclusions: At month 12, the ranibizumab 2.0 mg monthly group did not meet the prespecified superiority comparison and the ranibizumab 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg PRN groups did not meet the prespecified noninferiority (NI) comparison. However, all treatment groups demonstrated clinically meaningful visual improvement (+8.2 to +10.1 letters) and improved anatomic outcomes, with the PRN groups requiring approximately 4 fewer injections (6.9-7.7) than the monthly groups (11.2-11.3). No new safety events were observed despite a 4-fold dose escalation in the study. The pHase III, double-masked, multicenter, randomized, Active treatment-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg Ranibizumab administered monthly or on an as-needed Basis (PRN) in patients with subfoveal neOvasculaR age-related macular degeneration (HARBOR) study confirmed that ranibizumab 0.5 mg dosed monthly provides optimum results in patients with wet AMD.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877759606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877759606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.10.014
DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.10.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 23352196
AN - SCOPUS:84877759606
SN - 0161-6420
VL - 120
SP - 1046
EP - 1056
JO - Ophthalmology
JF - Ophthalmology
IS - 5
ER -