TY - JOUR
T1 - Tremor research group essential tremor rating scale (TETRAS)
T2 - Assessing impact of different item instructions and procedures
AU - Tremor Research Group
AU - Ondo, William G.
AU - Pascual, Belen
N1 - Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s).
PY - 2020/10/5
Y1 - 2020/10/5
N2 - Introduction: The Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Scale (TETRAS) is a well-validated instru-ment to assess essential tremor. However, similar to all other tremor rating scales, specific instructions for individual tasks are based mostly on expert opinion and tradition. Several tasks have multiple possible varia-tions that have never been compared to determine if they impact score. Methods: Using blinded, randomized videotapes, a group of tremor experts evaluated multiple ET patients to determine: 1. whether assessments of spirals and writing samples are similar if the rater only sees the end result as opposed to actually watching the task, 2. whether arm tremor ratings (postural and wing-beating) are similar if the subjects hold both hands out concurrently vs. if they only hold one arm out at a time, 3. whether heal to shin tremor scores vary between supine and sitting, and 4. compared cursive vs script writing samples. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were excellent (>0.95) for all arm assessments. Writing tremor was rated worse if only rating the spiral/writing photos (p < 0.05) rather than also viewing the writing process, arm tremor scores were higher if each arm was rated individually (p < 0.001), heal to shin scores were higher when done sitting (p = 0.01), and cursive writing tended to be rated higher than script (p = 0.08). Discussion: Minor procedure differences when administering the TETRAS can significantly alter results.
AB - Introduction: The Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Scale (TETRAS) is a well-validated instru-ment to assess essential tremor. However, similar to all other tremor rating scales, specific instructions for individual tasks are based mostly on expert opinion and tradition. Several tasks have multiple possible varia-tions that have never been compared to determine if they impact score. Methods: Using blinded, randomized videotapes, a group of tremor experts evaluated multiple ET patients to determine: 1. whether assessments of spirals and writing samples are similar if the rater only sees the end result as opposed to actually watching the task, 2. whether arm tremor ratings (postural and wing-beating) are similar if the subjects hold both hands out concurrently vs. if they only hold one arm out at a time, 3. whether heal to shin tremor scores vary between supine and sitting, and 4. compared cursive vs script writing samples. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were excellent (>0.95) for all arm assessments. Writing tremor was rated worse if only rating the spiral/writing photos (p < 0.05) rather than also viewing the writing process, arm tremor scores were higher if each arm was rated individually (p < 0.001), heal to shin scores were higher when done sitting (p = 0.01), and cursive writing tended to be rated higher than script (p = 0.08). Discussion: Minor procedure differences when administering the TETRAS can significantly alter results.
KW - Essential tremor
KW - Scales
KW - TETRAS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094668003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094668003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5334/tohm.64
DO - 10.5334/tohm.64
M3 - Article
C2 - 33101762
AN - SCOPUS:85094668003
SN - 2160-8288
VL - 10
SP - 1
EP - 5
JO - Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements
JF - Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements
M1 - 36
ER -