Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Breast Cancer on Medicaid, Pre- and Post-Expansion

Siran M. Koroukian, Weichuan Dong, Jeffrey M. Albert, Uriel Kim, Kirsten Eom, Johnie Rose, Cynthia Owusu, Kristine M. Zanotti, Gregory Cooper, Jennifer Tsui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of Medicaid expansion on breast cancer treatment and survival among Medicaid-insured women in Ohio, accounting for the timing of enrollment in Medicaid relative to their cancer diagnosis and post-expansion heterogeneous Medicaid eligibility criteria, thus addressing important limitations in previous studies. Methods: Using 2011–2017 Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System data linked with Medicaid claims data, we identified women aged 18 to 64 years diagnosed with local-stage or regional-stage breast cancer (n5876 and n51,957 pre-expansion and post-expansion, respectively). We accounted for women’s timing of enrollment in Medicaid relative to their cancer diagnosis, and flagged women post-expansion as Affordable Care Act (ACA) versus non-ACA, based on their income eligibility threshold. Study outcomes included standard treatment based on cancer stage and receipt of lumpectomy, mastectomy, chemotherapy, radiation, hormonal treatment, and/or treatment for HER2-positive tumors; time to treatment initiation (TTI); and overall survival. We conducted multivariable robust Poisson and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to evaluate the independent associations between Medicaid expansion and our outcomes of interest, adjusting for patient-level and area-level characteristics. Results: Receipt of standard treatment increased from 52.6% pre-expansion to 61.0% post-expansion (63.0% and 59.9% post-expansion in the ACA and non-ACA groups, respectively). Adjusting for potential con-founders, including timing of enrollment in Medicaid, being diagnosed in the post-expansion period was associated with a higher probability of receiving standard treatment (adjusted risk ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.06–1.22]) and shorter TTI (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.04–1.24]), but not with survival benefits (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.00 [0.80–1.26]). Conclusions: Medicaid expansion in Ohio was associated with improvements in receipt of standard treatment of breast cancer and shorter TTI but not with improved survival outcomes. Future studies should elucidate the mechanisms at play.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Breast Cancer on Medicaid, Pre- and Post-Expansion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this