Transvaginal bone-anchored sling for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: Effect of Valsalva leak point pressure and prior pelvic surgery on outcomes

David E. Rapp, Tanya M. Nazemi, Kathleen C. Kobashi, Fred E. Govier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

The effect of lower Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) and previous pelvic surgery on outcomes following sling surgery is controversial. We assessed outcomes following bone-anchored sling (BAS) placement in patients with intrinsic sphincteric deficiency (ISD) and previous pelvic surgery. A retrospective review of 149 patients undergoing BAS placement was performed. Patients were stratified by VLPP (≥60, <60, and <30) and by history of previous anti-incontinence/pelvic floor surgery. Outcomes were assessed using a questionnaire comprising validated urogenital distress inventory (UDI)-6, incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ)-7 questionnaires and additional items addressing satisfaction. In comparing the three VLPP cohorts, the percentage of patients reporting incontinence episodes of <1/week (64%, 68%, and 63%, respectively) and postoperative UDI/IIQ questionnaire scores were similar (p > 0.2, all comparisons). Lower rates of patients achieving <1 episode of incontinence per week (50%; p = 0.07) and worse UDI/IIQ scores (p = 0.02) were associated with patients with ≥2 prior surgeries. Whereas results are similar following BAS in patients with or without varying degrees of ISD, worse outcomes are associated with prior surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1211-1215
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Urogynecology Journal
Volume19
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Keywords

  • Bone anchor
  • Sling
  • Stress urinary incontinence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transvaginal bone-anchored sling for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: Effect of Valsalva leak point pressure and prior pelvic surgery on outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this