TY - JOUR
T1 - Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts in Liver Transplant Recipients for Management of Refractory Ascites
T2 - Clinical Outcome
AU - Saad, Wael E.A.
AU - Darwish, Wael M.
AU - Davies, Mark
AU - Waldman, David L.
PY - 2010/2/1
Y1 - 2010/2/1
N2 - Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in liver transplant recipients with recurrent portal hypertension presenting with refractory ascites. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of transplant recipients undergoing TIPS creation was performed over a 6-year period. Recipients were noted for age, sex, TIPS indication, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, cause of initial liver disease, and time between first transplantation and TIPS creation. Clinical success was defined as graft survival of longer than 1 month with improvement in ascites. New-onset or worsening encephalopathy was noted. Graft survival and patency were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. MELD score and portosystemic gradient (PSG) before and after TIPS creation were evaluated for prediction of graft loss less than 3 months after TIPS creation. Results: Nineteen liver transplant recipients underwent TIPS creation for ascites. Mean time from transplantation was 3.5 years (range, 3.7-112.2 months). Mean MELD score before TIPS creation was 17 (range, 7-24). The technical, hemodynamic, and clinical success rates were 100%, 95%, and 16%, respectively. Encephalopathy developed in five patients (26%). Thirty- and 90-day mortality rates were 16% (n = 3) and 21% (n = 4), respectively. Primary unassisted patency and graft survival rates at 1, 3, and 6 months were 100%, 90%, and 90% and 79%, 58%, and 47%, respectively. MELD score parameters were significant indicators (P < .05) for graft survival beyond 3 months, but PSG parameters were not. Conclusions: TIPS for the management of ascites in liver transplant recipients is not as clinically effective as it is in patients with native livers (16% vs 50%-80% in the literature). MELD score is a predictor of graft survival; PSG parameters are not.
AB - Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in liver transplant recipients with recurrent portal hypertension presenting with refractory ascites. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of transplant recipients undergoing TIPS creation was performed over a 6-year period. Recipients were noted for age, sex, TIPS indication, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, cause of initial liver disease, and time between first transplantation and TIPS creation. Clinical success was defined as graft survival of longer than 1 month with improvement in ascites. New-onset or worsening encephalopathy was noted. Graft survival and patency were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. MELD score and portosystemic gradient (PSG) before and after TIPS creation were evaluated for prediction of graft loss less than 3 months after TIPS creation. Results: Nineteen liver transplant recipients underwent TIPS creation for ascites. Mean time from transplantation was 3.5 years (range, 3.7-112.2 months). Mean MELD score before TIPS creation was 17 (range, 7-24). The technical, hemodynamic, and clinical success rates were 100%, 95%, and 16%, respectively. Encephalopathy developed in five patients (26%). Thirty- and 90-day mortality rates were 16% (n = 3) and 21% (n = 4), respectively. Primary unassisted patency and graft survival rates at 1, 3, and 6 months were 100%, 90%, and 90% and 79%, 58%, and 47%, respectively. MELD score parameters were significant indicators (P < .05) for graft survival beyond 3 months, but PSG parameters were not. Conclusions: TIPS for the management of ascites in liver transplant recipients is not as clinically effective as it is in patients with native livers (16% vs 50%-80% in the literature). MELD score is a predictor of graft survival; PSG parameters are not.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74549210111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74549210111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.10.025
DO - 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.10.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 20123207
AN - SCOPUS:74549210111
SN - 1051-0443
VL - 21
SP - 218
EP - 223
JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
IS - 2
ER -