TY - JOUR
T1 - Transition of Care of Stable Kidney Transplant Patients to Referring Nephrologists
T2 - A Survey of U.S. Transplant Program Staff
AU - the Graduating Kidney Transplant Patients Controversies Workgroup
AU - Anand, Prince Mohan
AU - Woodside, Kenneth J.
AU - Singh, Neeraj
AU - Alhamad, Tarek
AU - Bloom, Roy
AU - Gupta, Gaurav
AU - Singer, Gary
AU - Doshi, Mona
AU - Dadhania, Darshana
AU - Tanriover, Bekir
AU - Parsons, Ronald F.
AU - Wagner, Caroline
AU - Xiao, Huiling
AU - Lentine, Krista
AU - Adey, Deborah
AU - Alhamad, Tarek
AU - Anand, Prince
AU - Baliga, Raj
AU - Bhupathi, Satya
AU - Bloom, Roy
AU - Byford, Hannah
AU - Dadhania, Darshana
AU - Doshi, Mona
AU - Gupta, Gaurav
AU - Lee, Kristina
AU - Lentine, Krista
AU - Niederhaus, Silke
AU - Parsons, Ron
AU - Rosas, Sylvia
AU - Singer, Gary
AU - Singh, Neeraj
AU - Tanriover, Bekir
AU - Tsapepas, Demetra
AU - Waterman, Amy
AU - Yabu, Julie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024/11/7
Y1 - 2024/11/7
N2 - Background and Objectives: We conducted a national survey to assess the opinions and experiences of transplant center staff related to processes of care graduation. Methods: Following IRB approval, medical staff at U.S. adult kidney transplant programs were surveyed using the Qualtrics survey platform (4/5/2022–10/05/2022). Respondents were invited via email and listservs of professional societies. If > 1 survey was submitted for a program, a selection hierarchy was utilized (e.g., prioritizing nephrologists’ responses). Results: Respondents provided data from 46.7% of active programs (N = 92), representing 67% of the national kidney transplant volume. Most respondents (70%) were nephrologists. Full graduation to referring nephrologists was reported by 39% of transplant programs, with an additional 48% reporting partial graduation with ongoing co-management. Rationales for graduation were multifactorial, most commonly including patient travel distance (64%), maintenance of referral base (58%), continuity of care (58%), and center and/or patient burden (54%). Common reasons cited by programs for postgraduation return of care to the transplant center included worsening renal function (82%), malignancy (66%), opportunistic infection (63%), limited local nephrologist availability (60%), and pregnancy planning (57%). Additional coordinators and clinic staff were cited as needed to make transplant center perpetual care feasible by 78% of programs, with 71% stating that more clinicians are needed, while half thought more physical space or telemedicine are required. Conclusions: Graduation of kidney transplant patients is common, with half of programs using a joint-care approach and another third reporting full return of care to the referring nephrologist. Expanded opportunities related to transplant care for the broad nephrology community are essential.
AB - Background and Objectives: We conducted a national survey to assess the opinions and experiences of transplant center staff related to processes of care graduation. Methods: Following IRB approval, medical staff at U.S. adult kidney transplant programs were surveyed using the Qualtrics survey platform (4/5/2022–10/05/2022). Respondents were invited via email and listservs of professional societies. If > 1 survey was submitted for a program, a selection hierarchy was utilized (e.g., prioritizing nephrologists’ responses). Results: Respondents provided data from 46.7% of active programs (N = 92), representing 67% of the national kidney transplant volume. Most respondents (70%) were nephrologists. Full graduation to referring nephrologists was reported by 39% of transplant programs, with an additional 48% reporting partial graduation with ongoing co-management. Rationales for graduation were multifactorial, most commonly including patient travel distance (64%), maintenance of referral base (58%), continuity of care (58%), and center and/or patient burden (54%). Common reasons cited by programs for postgraduation return of care to the transplant center included worsening renal function (82%), malignancy (66%), opportunistic infection (63%), limited local nephrologist availability (60%), and pregnancy planning (57%). Additional coordinators and clinic staff were cited as needed to make transplant center perpetual care feasible by 78% of programs, with 71% stating that more clinicians are needed, while half thought more physical space or telemedicine are required. Conclusions: Graduation of kidney transplant patients is common, with half of programs using a joint-care approach and another third reporting full return of care to the referring nephrologist. Expanded opportunities related to transplant care for the broad nephrology community are essential.
KW - kidney transplantation
KW - nephrologists
KW - transition of care
KW - transplant center
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208612670&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85208612670&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ctr.15484
DO - 10.1111/ctr.15484
M3 - Article
C2 - 39512123
AN - SCOPUS:85208612670
SN - 0902-0063
VL - 38
JO - Clinical Transplantation
JF - Clinical Transplantation
IS - 11
M1 - e15484
ER -