Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection is a morbid and costly complication of total knee arthroplasty. Treatment options vary depending on chronicity of the infection, causative organism, and host factors. Some authors advocate single-stage exchange arthroplasty to decrease patient morbidity and healthcare utilization costs. Due to its proven efficacy for infection eradication and soft tissue healing, however, two-stage exchange arthroplasty remains the gold standard for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty. In this review, we present the technique of two-stage exchange arthroplasty and evidence supporting its use.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 84-90 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Seminars in Arthroplasty |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1 2015 |
Keywords
- Periprosthetic joint infection
- Revision arthroplasty
- Revision knee arthroplasty
- Total knee arthroplasty
- Two-stage revision arthroplasty
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The two-stage standard: Res ipsa loquitur'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS