TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of closed-loop medical devices on the autonomy and accountability of persons and systems
AU - Kellmeyer, Philipp
AU - Cochrane, Thomas
AU - Müller, Oliver
AU - Mitchell, Christine
AU - Ball, Tonio
AU - Fins, Joseph
AU - Biller-Andorno, Nikola
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Cambridge University Press 2016.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Closed-loop medical devices such as brain-computer interfaces are an emerging and rapidly advancing neurotechnology. The target patients for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are often severely paralyzed, and thus particularly vulnerable in terms of personal autonomy, decisionmaking capacity, and agency. Here we analyze the effects of closed-loop medical devices on the autonomy and accountability of both persons (as patients or research participants) and neurotechnological closed-loop medical systems. We show that although BCIs can strengthen patient autonomy by preserving or restoring communicative abilities and/or motor control, closed-loop devices may also create challenges for moral and legal accountability. We advocate the development of a comprehensive ethical and legal framework to address the challenges of emerging closed-loop neurotechnologies like BCIs and stress the centrality of informed consent and refusal as a means to foster accountability. We propose the creation of an international neuroethics task force with members from medical neuroscience, neuroengineering, computer science, medical law, and medical ethics, as well as representatives of patient advocacy groups and the public.
AB - Closed-loop medical devices such as brain-computer interfaces are an emerging and rapidly advancing neurotechnology. The target patients for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are often severely paralyzed, and thus particularly vulnerable in terms of personal autonomy, decisionmaking capacity, and agency. Here we analyze the effects of closed-loop medical devices on the autonomy and accountability of both persons (as patients or research participants) and neurotechnological closed-loop medical systems. We show that although BCIs can strengthen patient autonomy by preserving or restoring communicative abilities and/or motor control, closed-loop devices may also create challenges for moral and legal accountability. We advocate the development of a comprehensive ethical and legal framework to address the challenges of emerging closed-loop neurotechnologies like BCIs and stress the centrality of informed consent and refusal as a means to foster accountability. We propose the creation of an international neuroethics task force with members from medical neuroscience, neuroengineering, computer science, medical law, and medical ethics, as well as representatives of patient advocacy groups and the public.
KW - Keywords: autonomy
KW - accountability
KW - brain-computer interfaces
KW - neuroethics
KW - neurotechnology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988601038&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988601038&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0963180116000359
DO - 10.1017/S0963180116000359
M3 - Article
C2 - 27634714
AN - SCOPUS:84988601038
SN - 0963-1801
VL - 25
SP - 623
EP - 633
JO - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
JF - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
IS - 4
ER -