Abstract
Background: Population-based studies evaluating laparoscopic colectomy and outcomes compared with open surgery have concentrated on elective resections. As such, data assessing non-elective laparoscopic colectomies are limited. Our goal was to evaluate the current usage and outcomes of laparoscopic in the urgent and emergent setting in the USA. Methods: A national inpatient database was reviewed from 2008 to 2011 for right, left, and sigmoid colectomies in the non-elective setting. Cases were stratified by approach into open or laparoscopic groups. Demographics, perioperative clinical variables, and financial outcomes were compared across each group. Results: A total of 22,719 non-elective colectomies were analyzed. The vast majority (95.8 %) was open. Most cases were performed in an urban setting at non-teaching hospitals by general surgeons. Colorectal surgeons were significantly more likely to perform a case laparoscopic than general surgeons (p
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3321-3326 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1 2016 |
Keywords
- Colon and rectal surgery
- Emergency surgery
- Emergent colectomy
- Healthcare outcomes
- Laparoscopic surgery
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
Divisions
- Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The current status of emergent laparoscopic colectomy: a population-based study of clinical and financial outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS