Abstract
Tedizolid (TZD) and daptomycin (DAP) were assessed in a rat endocarditis model against Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium (resistant to vancomycin and ampicillin), and Staphylococcus aureus. As a monotherapy, TZD for 5 days was not effective in a comparison with no-treatment controls, while DAP for 5 days was significantly effective against these bacteria. Step-down therapy (DAP for 3 days followed by TZD for 2 days) was as effective as DAP for 5 days and was comparable to 3 days of DAP plus ceftriaxone against all bacteria and to 3 days of DAP plus gentamicin against E. faecalis OG1RF.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | e02303-19 |
| Journal | Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 1 2020 |
Keywords
- Daptomycin
- E. faecalis
- E. faecium
- Enterococci
- Experimental endocarditis
- MRSA/VRSA
- Staphylococci
- Tedizolid
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pharmacology
- Pharmacology (medical)
- Infectious Diseases
Divisions
- Infectious Disease
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Tedizolid as step-down therapy following daptomycin versus continuation of daptomycin against enterococci and methicillin- And vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a rat endocarditis model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS