Abstract
Antitumor immune polarization is a key predictor of clinical outcomes to cancer therapy. An emerging concept influencing clinical outcome involves the spatial location of CD8+ T cells, within the tumor. Our earlier work demonstrated immunosuppressive effects of NOS2 and COX2 tumor expression. Here, we show that NOS2/COX2 levels influence both the polarization and spatial location of lymphoid cells including CD8+ T cells. Importantly, elevated tumor NOS2/COX2 correlated with exclusion of CD8+ T cells from the tumor epithelium. In contrast, tumors expressing low NOS2/COX2 had increased CD8+ T cell penetration into the tumor epithelium. Consistent with a causative relationship between these observations, pharmacological inhibition of COX2 with indomethacin dramatically reduced tumor growth of the 4T1 model of TNBC in both WT and Nos2- mice. This regimen led to complete tumor regression in ∼20–25% of tumor-bearing Nos2- mice, and these animals were resistant to tumor rechallenge. Th1 cytokines were elevated in the blood of treated mice and intratumoral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were higher in mice that received indomethacin when compared to control untreated mice. Multiplex immunofluorescence imaging confirmed our phenotyping results and demonstrated that targeted Nos2/Cox2 blockade improved CD8+ T cell penetration into the 4T1 tumor core. These findings are consistent with our observations in low NOS2/COX2 expressing breast tumors proving that COX2 activity is responsible for limiting the spatial distribution of effector T cells in TNBC. Together these results suggest that clinically available NSAID's may provide a cost-effective, novel immunotherapeutic approach for treatment of aggressive tumors including triple negative breast cancer.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 102529 |
Pages (from-to) | 102529 |
Journal | Redox Biology |
Volume | 58 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2022 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Organic Chemistry
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Systemic Nos2 Depletion and Cox inhibition limits TNBC disease progression and alters lymphoid cell spatial orientation and density'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
In: Redox Biology, Vol. 58, 102529, 12.2022, p. 102529.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Systemic Nos2 Depletion and Cox inhibition limits TNBC disease progression and alters lymphoid cell spatial orientation and density
AU - Somasundaram, Veena
AU - Ridnour, Lisa A.
AU - Cheng, Robert YS
AU - Walke, Abigail J.
AU - Kedei, Noemi
AU - Bhattacharyya, Dibyangana D.
AU - Wink, Adelaide L.
AU - Edmondson, Elijah F.
AU - Butcher, Donna
AU - Warner, Andrew C.
AU - Dorsey, Tiffany H.
AU - Scheiblin, David A.
AU - Heinz, William
AU - Bryant, Richard J.
AU - Kinders, Robert J.
AU - Lipkowitz, Stanley
AU - Wong, Stephen TC
AU - Pore, Milind
AU - Hewitt, Stephen M.
AU - McVicar, Daniel W.
AU - Anderson, Stephen K.
AU - Chang, Jenny
AU - Glynn, Sharon A.
AU - Ambs, Stefan
AU - Lockett, Stephen J.
AU - Wink, David A.
N1 - Funding Information: Breast cancer is the most common tumor globally among women and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women in North America [1,2]. It is a heterogeneous disease that can be classified as estrogen receptor positive (ER+) or the more aggressive ER negative (ER-) and triple negative (ER-, PR-, HER2-) subtypes. The upregulation of proinflammatory signaling pathways has been reported in breast cancer, suggesting a regulatory impact on the immune system [3]. In ER- and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), nitric oxide synthase-2 (NOS2) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) have been described as independent predictors of disease outcome [4–6]. Recently, elevated tumor coexpression of NOS2/COX2 demonstrated strong predictive power associated with poor survival among ER-patients as defined by a hazard ratio (HR) of 21 [7]. In addition, NOS2-derived NO and COX2-derived prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) were shown to promote feed-forward NOS2/COX2 crosstalk where NO induced COX2 and PGE2 induced NOS2, as well as other downstream signaling targets [7]. While NOS2-derived NO is a driver of oncogenesis, chemoresistance, metastasis, and immunosuppression, COX2 supports both NOS2 expression and mediates immune suppression both systemically and within the tumor microenvironment (TME) [7–11]. Studies have shown that NOS inhibition improved treatment efficacy by down regulating IL-10 within the TME [12,13]. Importantly, a recent phase 1/2 clinical trial has demonstrated improved clinical outcome defined by an overall response rate of 45.8% in patients with chemorefractory, locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and metastatic TNBC that received the pan-NOS inhibitor L-NMMA and aspirin combined with taxane [14]. Importantly, this study also revealed that 27.3% of treated LABC patients achieved pathological complete response at surgery where remodeling of the tumor immune environment was observed in patients responding to this therapy [14]. Given that COX2 promotes immune suppression within the TME, targeting both NOS2/COX2 may further improve outcome and thus provide a novel option in breast cancer treatment by augmented antitumor immune response [9,10].Another important feature of NOS2- + INDO combination therapy is increased B cell infiltration. The RNAseq analysis identified the modulation of several B cell-associated genes. The RNAseq observations were further supported by CODEX analyses, which demonstrated an increase in B cell and APC density (Fig. 4, Supplemental Fig. 4) as well as reduced tumor growth and metastasis indicating a potentiated antitumor response. Importantly, these results are consistent with a recent clinical study, where chemo-resistant metastatic breast cancer patients who responded to docetaxel and adjuvant NOS inhibition exhibited markedly increased B cell penetration into the tumor [14]. Taken together, NOS2/COX2 blockade polarizes the tumor immune microenvironment favoring a potent proinflammatory, antitumor immune response.This work was funded in whole or in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research NIH, under Contract HHSN261200800001E (VS, LAR, RC, DDB, THD, RK, SL, SMH, DWM, SKA, SA, DAW). This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of NIH, Frederick National Lab, Center for Cancer Research and 5N91019D00024 (AW, ALW, DAS, WFH, EFE, DB, AW, MP, SKA, SJL), Cancer Research UK/Royal College of Surgeons of England Clinician Scientist Fellowship C39297/A22748 (RJB), NIH R01CA238727, NIH U01CA253553, and John S Dunn Research Foundation (STCW), NCI grant no. U54 CA210181, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF), the Moran Foundation, Causes for a Cure, philanthropic support from M. Neal and R. Neal, and the Center for Drug Repositioning and Development Program (CREDO) (JCC), Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) grant number 17/CDA/4638, and a SFI and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) grant number 13/RC/2073 (SAG).The authors wish to thank Tim Back, Tim Gower, and Adrienne Kimmel for their technical expertise. This project was funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, NIH, under Contract HHSN261200800001E (VS, LAR, RYSC, NK, DDB, THD, RJK, SL, SMH, DWM, SKA, SA, DAW). This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of NIH, Frederick National Lab, Center for Cancer Research and 5N91019D00024 (AJW, ALW, EFE, DB, AW, DAS, WFH, MP, SKA, SJL), NIH R01CA238727, NIH U01CA253553, and John S Dunn Research Foundation (STCW), NCI grant no. U54 CA210181, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF), the Moran Foundation, Causes for a Cure, philanthropic support from M. Neal and R. Neal, and the Center for Drug Repositioning and Development Program (CREDO) (JCC), Breast Cancer Now Grant 2013MayPR019 (SAG). The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government. Funding Information: This work was funded in whole or in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research NIH , under Contract HHSN261200800001E (VS, LAR, RC, DDB, THD, RK, SL, SMH, DWM, SKA, SA, DAW). This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of NIH , Frederick National Lab, Center for Cancer Research and 5N91019D00024 (AW, ALW, DAS, WFH, EFE, DB, AW, MP, SKA, SJL), Cancer Research UK/Royal College of Surgeons of England Clinician Scientist Fellowship C39297/A22748 (RJB) , NIH R01CA238727 , NIH U01CA253553 , and John S Dunn Research Foundation (STCW), NCI grant no. U54 CA210181 , the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF) , the Moran Foundation, Causes for a Cure, philanthropic support from M. Neal and R. Neal, and the Center for Drug Repositioning and Development Program (CREDO) ( JCC ), Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) grant number 17/CDA/4638 , and a SFI and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) grant number 13/RC/2073 (SAG). Funding Information: The authors wish to thank Tim Back, Tim Gower, and Adrienne Kimmel for their technical expertise. This project was funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, NIH , under Contract HHSN261200800001E (VS, LAR, RYSC, NK, DDB, THD, RJK, SL, SMH, DWM, SKA, SA, DAW). This research was supported in part by t he Intramural Research Program of NIH , Frederick National Lab, Center for Cancer Research and 5N91019D00024 (AJW, ALW, EFE, DB, AW, DAS, WFH, MP, SKA, SJL), NIH R01CA238727 , NIH U01CA253553 , and John S Dunn Research Foundation (STCW), NCI grant no. U54 CA210181 , the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF) , the Moran Foundation, Causes for a Cure, philanthropic support from M. Neal and R. Neal, and the Center for Drug Repositioning and Development Program (CREDO) ( JCC ), Breast Cancer Now Grant 2013MayPR019 (SAG). The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government. Publisher Copyright: © 2022
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Antitumor immune polarization is a key predictor of clinical outcomes to cancer therapy. An emerging concept influencing clinical outcome involves the spatial location of CD8+ T cells, within the tumor. Our earlier work demonstrated immunosuppressive effects of NOS2 and COX2 tumor expression. Here, we show that NOS2/COX2 levels influence both the polarization and spatial location of lymphoid cells including CD8+ T cells. Importantly, elevated tumor NOS2/COX2 correlated with exclusion of CD8+ T cells from the tumor epithelium. In contrast, tumors expressing low NOS2/COX2 had increased CD8+ T cell penetration into the tumor epithelium. Consistent with a causative relationship between these observations, pharmacological inhibition of COX2 with indomethacin dramatically reduced tumor growth of the 4T1 model of TNBC in both WT and Nos2- mice. This regimen led to complete tumor regression in ∼20–25% of tumor-bearing Nos2- mice, and these animals were resistant to tumor rechallenge. Th1 cytokines were elevated in the blood of treated mice and intratumoral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were higher in mice that received indomethacin when compared to control untreated mice. Multiplex immunofluorescence imaging confirmed our phenotyping results and demonstrated that targeted Nos2/Cox2 blockade improved CD8+ T cell penetration into the 4T1 tumor core. These findings are consistent with our observations in low NOS2/COX2 expressing breast tumors proving that COX2 activity is responsible for limiting the spatial distribution of effector T cells in TNBC. Together these results suggest that clinically available NSAID's may provide a cost-effective, novel immunotherapeutic approach for treatment of aggressive tumors including triple negative breast cancer.
AB - Antitumor immune polarization is a key predictor of clinical outcomes to cancer therapy. An emerging concept influencing clinical outcome involves the spatial location of CD8+ T cells, within the tumor. Our earlier work demonstrated immunosuppressive effects of NOS2 and COX2 tumor expression. Here, we show that NOS2/COX2 levels influence both the polarization and spatial location of lymphoid cells including CD8+ T cells. Importantly, elevated tumor NOS2/COX2 correlated with exclusion of CD8+ T cells from the tumor epithelium. In contrast, tumors expressing low NOS2/COX2 had increased CD8+ T cell penetration into the tumor epithelium. Consistent with a causative relationship between these observations, pharmacological inhibition of COX2 with indomethacin dramatically reduced tumor growth of the 4T1 model of TNBC in both WT and Nos2- mice. This regimen led to complete tumor regression in ∼20–25% of tumor-bearing Nos2- mice, and these animals were resistant to tumor rechallenge. Th1 cytokines were elevated in the blood of treated mice and intratumoral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were higher in mice that received indomethacin when compared to control untreated mice. Multiplex immunofluorescence imaging confirmed our phenotyping results and demonstrated that targeted Nos2/Cox2 blockade improved CD8+ T cell penetration into the 4T1 tumor core. These findings are consistent with our observations in low NOS2/COX2 expressing breast tumors proving that COX2 activity is responsible for limiting the spatial distribution of effector T cells in TNBC. Together these results suggest that clinically available NSAID's may provide a cost-effective, novel immunotherapeutic approach for treatment of aggressive tumors including triple negative breast cancer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141786329&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85141786329&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102529
DO - 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102529
M3 - Article
C2 - 36375380
SN - 2213-2317
VL - 58
SP - 102529
JO - Redox Biology
JF - Redox Biology
M1 - 102529
ER -