TY - JOUR
T1 - Subtyping CKD patients by consensus clustering
T2 - The chronic renal insufficiency cohort (CRIC) study
AU - Zheng, Zihe
AU - Waikar, Sushrut S.
AU - Schmidt, Insa M.
AU - Richard Landis, J.
AU - Hsu, Chi Yuan
AU - Shafi, Tariq
AU - Feldman, Harold I.
AU - Anderson, Amanda H.
AU - Wilson, Francis P.
AU - Chen, Jing
AU - Rincon-Choles, Hernan
AU - Ricardo, Ana C.
AU - Saab, Georges
AU - Isakova, Tamara
AU - Kallem, Radhakrishna
AU - Fink, Jeffrey C.
AU - Rao, Panduranga S.
AU - Xie, Dawei
AU - Yang, Wei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Nephrology
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Background CKD is a heterogeneous condition with multiple underlying causes, risk factors, and outcomes. Subtyping CKD with multidimensional patient data holds the key to precision medicine. Consensus clustering may reveal CKD subgroups with different risk profiles of adverse outcomes. Methods We used unsupervised consensus clustering on 72 baseline characteristics among 2696 participants in the prospective Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study to identify novel CKD subgroups that best represent the data pattern. Calculation of the standardized difference of each parameter used the cutoff of 60.3 to show subgroup features. CKD subgroup associations were examined with the clinical end points of kidney failure, the composite outcome of cardiovascular diseases, and death. Results The algorithm revealed three unique CKD subgroups that best represented patients’ baseline characteristics. Patients with relatively favorable levels of bone density and cardiac and kidney function markers, with lower prevalence of diabetes and obesity, and who used fewer medications formed cluster 1 (n51203). Patients with higher prevalence of diabetes and obesity and who used more medications formed cluster 2 (n51098). Patients with less favorable levels of bone mineral density, poor cardiac and kidney function markers, and inflammation delineated cluster 3 (n5395). These three subgroups, when linked with future clinical end points, were associated with different risks of CKD progression, cardiovascular disease, and death. Furthermore, patient heterogeneity among predefined subgroups with similar baseline kidney function emerged. Conclusions Consensus clustering synthesized the patterns of baseline clinical and laboratory measures and revealed distinct CKD subgroups, which were associated with markedly different risks of important clinical outcomes. Further examination of patient subgroups and associated biomarkers may provide next steps toward precision medicine.
AB - Background CKD is a heterogeneous condition with multiple underlying causes, risk factors, and outcomes. Subtyping CKD with multidimensional patient data holds the key to precision medicine. Consensus clustering may reveal CKD subgroups with different risk profiles of adverse outcomes. Methods We used unsupervised consensus clustering on 72 baseline characteristics among 2696 participants in the prospective Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study to identify novel CKD subgroups that best represent the data pattern. Calculation of the standardized difference of each parameter used the cutoff of 60.3 to show subgroup features. CKD subgroup associations were examined with the clinical end points of kidney failure, the composite outcome of cardiovascular diseases, and death. Results The algorithm revealed three unique CKD subgroups that best represented patients’ baseline characteristics. Patients with relatively favorable levels of bone density and cardiac and kidney function markers, with lower prevalence of diabetes and obesity, and who used fewer medications formed cluster 1 (n51203). Patients with higher prevalence of diabetes and obesity and who used more medications formed cluster 2 (n51098). Patients with less favorable levels of bone mineral density, poor cardiac and kidney function markers, and inflammation delineated cluster 3 (n5395). These three subgroups, when linked with future clinical end points, were associated with different risks of CKD progression, cardiovascular disease, and death. Furthermore, patient heterogeneity among predefined subgroups with similar baseline kidney function emerged. Conclusions Consensus clustering synthesized the patterns of baseline clinical and laboratory measures and revealed distinct CKD subgroups, which were associated with markedly different risks of important clinical outcomes. Further examination of patient subgroups and associated biomarkers may provide next steps toward precision medicine.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102145187&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102145187&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1681/ASN.2020030239
DO - 10.1681/ASN.2020030239
M3 - Article
C2 - 33462081
AN - SCOPUS:85102145187
SN - 1046-6673
VL - 32
SP - 639
EP - 653
JO - Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
JF - Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
IS - 3
ER -