TY - JOUR
T1 - Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Sorafenib Alone in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
T2 - The NRG Oncology/RTOG 1112 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial
AU - Dawson, Laura A.
AU - Winter, Kathryn A.
AU - Knox, Jennifer J.
AU - Zhu, Andrew X.
AU - Krishnan, Sunil
AU - Guha, Chandan
AU - Kachnic, Lisa A.
AU - Gillin, Michael T.
AU - Hong, Theodore S.
AU - Craig, Timothy D.
AU - Williams, Terence M.
AU - Hosni, Ali
AU - Chen, Eric
AU - Noonan, Anne M.
AU - Koay, Eugene J.
AU - Sinha, Rishi
AU - Lock, Michael I.
AU - Ohri, Nitin
AU - Dorth, Jennifer A.
AU - Delouya, Guila
AU - Swaminath, Anand
AU - Moughan, Jennifer
AU - Crane, Christopher H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/2/20
Y1 - 2025/2/20
N2 - Importance: Most patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recur within the liver following systemic therapy. Objective: To determine whether stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) improves outcomes in patients with locally advanced HCC compared with sorafenib alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter phase 3 randomized clinical trial randomized patients with HCC 1:1 to sorafenib or SBRT followed by sorafenib, stratified by performance status, liver function, degree of metastases, and macrovascular invasion. Eligible patients had HCC unsuitable for or refractory to standard local-regional therapies and were candidates for first-line systemic therapy. Data were collected from April 2013 to March 2021, and data were analyzed from July 2022 to August 2023. Intervention: Personalized SBRT, 27.5 to 50 Gy in 5 fractions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events, and quality of life. Results: Of 193 patients randomized, 177 were eligible. Accrual was stopped early due to a change in standard-of-care systemic therapy. Of 177 included patients, 150 (84.7%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 66 (60-72) years. Macrovascular invasion was seen in 131 (74.0%). As of July 1, 2022, the median OS was 12.3 months (90% CI, 10.6-14.3) with sorafenib vs 15.8 months (90% CI, 11.4-19.2) following SBRT and sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 90% CI, 0.59-1.01; 1-sided P =.06). Adjusting for stratification factors, OS was improved with SBRT (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99; 2-sided P =.04). Median PFS was improved from 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.4-6.3) with sorafenib to 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.5-11.9) with SBRT and sorafenib (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.75; 2-sided P <.001). Treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events were seen in 37 of 88 (42%) and 39 of 83 (47%) of patients treated with sorafenib vs SBRT and sorafenib, respectively (P =.52). There were 2 treatment-related deaths in the sorafenib group (death not otherwise specified and liver failure) and 1 in the SBRT and sorafenib group (lung infection). At 6 months, improved quality of life was seen in 2 of 20 (10%) and 6 of 17 (35%) of patients treated with sorafenib and SBRT and sorafenib, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, among patients with locally advanced HCC, SBRT was associated with a clinically important but not statistically significant improved overall survival compared with sorafenib alone.
AB - Importance: Most patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recur within the liver following systemic therapy. Objective: To determine whether stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) improves outcomes in patients with locally advanced HCC compared with sorafenib alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter phase 3 randomized clinical trial randomized patients with HCC 1:1 to sorafenib or SBRT followed by sorafenib, stratified by performance status, liver function, degree of metastases, and macrovascular invasion. Eligible patients had HCC unsuitable for or refractory to standard local-regional therapies and were candidates for first-line systemic therapy. Data were collected from April 2013 to March 2021, and data were analyzed from July 2022 to August 2023. Intervention: Personalized SBRT, 27.5 to 50 Gy in 5 fractions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events, and quality of life. Results: Of 193 patients randomized, 177 were eligible. Accrual was stopped early due to a change in standard-of-care systemic therapy. Of 177 included patients, 150 (84.7%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 66 (60-72) years. Macrovascular invasion was seen in 131 (74.0%). As of July 1, 2022, the median OS was 12.3 months (90% CI, 10.6-14.3) with sorafenib vs 15.8 months (90% CI, 11.4-19.2) following SBRT and sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 90% CI, 0.59-1.01; 1-sided P =.06). Adjusting for stratification factors, OS was improved with SBRT (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99; 2-sided P =.04). Median PFS was improved from 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.4-6.3) with sorafenib to 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.5-11.9) with SBRT and sorafenib (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.75; 2-sided P <.001). Treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events were seen in 37 of 88 (42%) and 39 of 83 (47%) of patients treated with sorafenib vs SBRT and sorafenib, respectively (P =.52). There were 2 treatment-related deaths in the sorafenib group (death not otherwise specified and liver failure) and 1 in the SBRT and sorafenib group (lung infection). At 6 months, improved quality of life was seen in 2 of 20 (10%) and 6 of 17 (35%) of patients treated with sorafenib and SBRT and sorafenib, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, among patients with locally advanced HCC, SBRT was associated with a clinically important but not statistically significant improved overall survival compared with sorafenib alone.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216493058&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85216493058&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5403
DO - 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5403
M3 - Article
C2 - 39699905
AN - SCOPUS:85216493058
SN - 2374-2437
VL - 11
SP - 136
EP - 144
JO - JAMA oncology
JF - JAMA oncology
IS - 2
ER -