TY - JOUR
T1 - Staging Systems for Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
T2 - The Revised International Staging System Shows the Most Differentiation between Groups
AU - Scott, Emma C.
AU - Hari, Parameswaran
AU - Kumar, Sathish
AU - Fraser, Raphael
AU - Davila, Omar
AU - Shah, Nina
AU - Gale, Robert Peter
AU - Diaz, Miguel Angel
AU - Agrawal, Vaibhav
AU - Cornell, Robert F.
AU - Ganguly, Siddhartha
AU - Akpek, Gorgun
AU - Freytes, Cesar
AU - Hashmi, Shahrukh
AU - Malek, Ehsan
AU - Kamble, Rammurti T.
AU - Lazarus, Hillard
AU - Solh, Melhem
AU - Usmani, Saad Z.
AU - Kanate, Abraham S.
AU - Saad, Ayman
AU - Chhabra, Saurabh
AU - Gergis, Usama
AU - Cerny, Jan
AU - Kyle, Robert A.
AU - Lee, Cindy
AU - Kindwall-Keller, Tamila
AU - Assal, Amer
AU - Hildebrandt, Gerhard C.
AU - Holmberg, Leona
AU - Maziarz, Richard T.
AU - Nishihori, Taiga
AU - Seo, Sachiko
AU - Kumar, Shaji
AU - Mark, Tomer
AU - D'Souza, Anita
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - The Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) and the International Myeloma Working Group 2014 (IMWG 2014) are newer staging systems used to prognosticate multiple myeloma (MM) outcomes. We hypothesized that these would provide better prognostic differentiation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) compared with ISS. We analyzed the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database from 2008 to 2014 to compare the 3 systems (N = 628) among newly diagnosed MM patients undergoing upfront autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). The median follow-up of survivors was 48 (range, 3 to 99) months. The R-ISS provided the greatest differentiation between survival curves for each stage (for overall survival [OS], the differentiation was 1.74 using the R-ISS, 1.58 using ISS, and 1.60 using the IMWG 2014). Univariate analyses at 3 years for OS showed R-ISS I at 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83% to 93%), II at 75% (95% CI, 70% to 80%), and III at 56% (95% CI, 3% to 69%; P <.001). An integrated Brier score function demonstrated the R-ISS had the best prediction for PFS, though all systems had similar prediction for OS. Among available systems, the R-ISS is the most optimal among available prognostic tools for newly diagnosed MM undergoing AHCT. We recommend that serum lactate dehydrogenase and cytogenetic data be performed on every MM patient at diagnosis to allow accurate prognostication.
AB - The Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) and the International Myeloma Working Group 2014 (IMWG 2014) are newer staging systems used to prognosticate multiple myeloma (MM) outcomes. We hypothesized that these would provide better prognostic differentiation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) compared with ISS. We analyzed the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database from 2008 to 2014 to compare the 3 systems (N = 628) among newly diagnosed MM patients undergoing upfront autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). The median follow-up of survivors was 48 (range, 3 to 99) months. The R-ISS provided the greatest differentiation between survival curves for each stage (for overall survival [OS], the differentiation was 1.74 using the R-ISS, 1.58 using ISS, and 1.60 using the IMWG 2014). Univariate analyses at 3 years for OS showed R-ISS I at 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83% to 93%), II at 75% (95% CI, 70% to 80%), and III at 56% (95% CI, 3% to 69%; P <.001). An integrated Brier score function demonstrated the R-ISS had the best prediction for PFS, though all systems had similar prediction for OS. Among available systems, the R-ISS is the most optimal among available prognostic tools for newly diagnosed MM undergoing AHCT. We recommend that serum lactate dehydrogenase and cytogenetic data be performed on every MM patient at diagnosis to allow accurate prognostication.
KW - International staging system
KW - Revised international staging system
KW - Staging system comparison
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054709914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054709914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.013
DO - 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 30142419
AN - SCOPUS:85054709914
SN - 1083-8791
VL - 24
SP - 2443
EP - 2449
JO - Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
JF - Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
IS - 12
ER -