TY - JOUR
T1 - Spectral versus time-domain OCT in detecting preoperative epiretinal membranes that accompany macular holes
AU - Rao, Prethy
AU - Yonekawa, Yoshihiro
AU - Thomas, Benjamin J.
AU - Drenser, Kimberly A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Wichtig Publishing.
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - Purpose: To compare the sensitivities of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) versus timedomain OCT (TD-OCT) in identifying epiretinal membranes (ERM) preoperatively in patients who underwent surgery for full-thickness macular holes (FTMH). Methods: This is an interventional retrospective case series of 59 eyes diagnosed with FTMHs who underwent 25-G pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling between 2009 and 2015. Preoperative OCTs were obtained by SD-OCT (Spectralis, Heidelberg, Germany) or TD-OCT (Stratus, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA). Volume scans were reviewed for ERM accompanying the FTMH. This was compared to indocyanine greennegative staining and intraoperative findings of ERM as the gold standard. Results: Baseline characteristics between the SD-OCT and TD-OCT groups were comparable. Mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 41.4 weeks (±49.0). Of 59 eyes, 33 (55.9%) exhibited an ERM intraoperatively. Four ERMs (SD-OCT group) compared to 12 (TD-OCT group) were not visualized on preoperative OCT (p = 0.003). Sensitivity and specificity of SD-OCT in ERM detection was 79% and 100% compared to 14% and 91% for TD-OCT. Visual acuity improved in both arms (0.5 and 0.3 logMAR units in SD-OCT and TD-OCT, respectively (p = 0.002, 0.0002). Conclusions: We found that SD-OCT was superior to TD-OCT in identifying the presence of ERM preoperatively in patients who underwent macular hole surgery. Since ERMs may decrease the chance of successful pharmacologic vitreolysis, we recommend using SD-OCT over TD-OCT in the evaluation of patients with FTMH to more accurately identify ERMs and allow more comprehensive treatment decisions (pharmacologic versus surgical).
AB - Purpose: To compare the sensitivities of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) versus timedomain OCT (TD-OCT) in identifying epiretinal membranes (ERM) preoperatively in patients who underwent surgery for full-thickness macular holes (FTMH). Methods: This is an interventional retrospective case series of 59 eyes diagnosed with FTMHs who underwent 25-G pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling between 2009 and 2015. Preoperative OCTs were obtained by SD-OCT (Spectralis, Heidelberg, Germany) or TD-OCT (Stratus, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA). Volume scans were reviewed for ERM accompanying the FTMH. This was compared to indocyanine greennegative staining and intraoperative findings of ERM as the gold standard. Results: Baseline characteristics between the SD-OCT and TD-OCT groups were comparable. Mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 41.4 weeks (±49.0). Of 59 eyes, 33 (55.9%) exhibited an ERM intraoperatively. Four ERMs (SD-OCT group) compared to 12 (TD-OCT group) were not visualized on preoperative OCT (p = 0.003). Sensitivity and specificity of SD-OCT in ERM detection was 79% and 100% compared to 14% and 91% for TD-OCT. Visual acuity improved in both arms (0.5 and 0.3 logMAR units in SD-OCT and TD-OCT, respectively (p = 0.002, 0.0002). Conclusions: We found that SD-OCT was superior to TD-OCT in identifying the presence of ERM preoperatively in patients who underwent macular hole surgery. Since ERMs may decrease the chance of successful pharmacologic vitreolysis, we recommend using SD-OCT over TD-OCT in the evaluation of patients with FTMH to more accurately identify ERMs and allow more comprehensive treatment decisions (pharmacologic versus surgical).
KW - Epiretinal membrane
KW - Macular hole
KW - Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
KW - Time-domain optical coherence tomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015769785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015769785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5301/ejo.5000862
DO - 10.5301/ejo.5000862
M3 - Article
C2 - 27646327
AN - SCOPUS:85015769785
VL - 27
SP - 185
EP - 189
JO - European Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - European Journal of Ophthalmology
SN - 1120-6721
IS - 2
ER -