TY - JOUR
T1 - Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills
AU - Steadman, Randolph H.
AU - Coates, Wendy C.
AU - Yue, Ming Huang
AU - Matevosian, Rima
AU - Larmon, Baxter R.
AU - McCullough, Lynne
AU - Ariel, Danit
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was conducted at and funded by the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA. Dr. Steadman has received honoraria in the past from METI, the manufacturer of the simulator used in this study. METI did not fund or participate in any aspect of this research. Laboratory Investigations
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006/1
Y1 - 2006/1
N2 - Objective: To determine whether full-scale simulation (SIM) is superior to interactive problem-based learning (PBL) for teaching medical students acute care assessment and management skills. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Simulation center at a U.S. medical school. Subjects: Thirty-one fourth-year medical students in a week-long acute care course. Interventions: After institutional review board approval and informed consent, eligible students were randomized to either the SIM or PBL group. On day 1, all subjects underwent a simulator-based initial assessment designed to evaluate their critical care skills. Two blinded investigators assessed each student using a standardized checklist. Subsequently, the PBL group learned about dyspnea in a standard PBL format. The SIM group learned about dyspnea using the simulator. To equalize simulator education time, the PBL group learned about acute abdominal pain on the simulator, whereas the SIM group used the PBL format. On day 5, each student was tested on a unique dyspnea scenario. Measurements and Main Results: Mean initial assessment and final assessment checklist scores and their change for the SIM and PBL groups were compared using the Student's t-test. A p < .05 was considered significant. The SIM and PBL groups had similar mean (PBL 0.44, SIM 0.47, p = .64) initial assessment scores (earned score divided by maximum score) and were deemed equivalent. The SIM group performed better than the PBL group on the final assessment (mean, PBL 0.53, SIM 0.72, p < .0001). When each student's change in score (percent correct on final assessment minus percent correct on the initial assessment) was compared, SIM group students performed better (mean improvement, SIM 25 percentage points vs. PBL 8 percentage points, p < .04) Conclusions: For fourth-year medical students, simulation-based learning was superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills.
AB - Objective: To determine whether full-scale simulation (SIM) is superior to interactive problem-based learning (PBL) for teaching medical students acute care assessment and management skills. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Simulation center at a U.S. medical school. Subjects: Thirty-one fourth-year medical students in a week-long acute care course. Interventions: After institutional review board approval and informed consent, eligible students were randomized to either the SIM or PBL group. On day 1, all subjects underwent a simulator-based initial assessment designed to evaluate their critical care skills. Two blinded investigators assessed each student using a standardized checklist. Subsequently, the PBL group learned about dyspnea in a standard PBL format. The SIM group learned about dyspnea using the simulator. To equalize simulator education time, the PBL group learned about acute abdominal pain on the simulator, whereas the SIM group used the PBL format. On day 5, each student was tested on a unique dyspnea scenario. Measurements and Main Results: Mean initial assessment and final assessment checklist scores and their change for the SIM and PBL groups were compared using the Student's t-test. A p < .05 was considered significant. The SIM and PBL groups had similar mean (PBL 0.44, SIM 0.47, p = .64) initial assessment scores (earned score divided by maximum score) and were deemed equivalent. The SIM group performed better than the PBL group on the final assessment (mean, PBL 0.53, SIM 0.72, p < .0001). When each student's change in score (percent correct on final assessment minus percent correct on the initial assessment) was compared, SIM group students performed better (mean improvement, SIM 25 percentage points vs. PBL 8 percentage points, p < .04) Conclusions: For fourth-year medical students, simulation-based learning was superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills.
KW - Clinical competence
KW - Computer simulation
KW - Educational measurement
KW - Medical education
KW - Problem-based learning
KW - Standards
KW - Undergraduate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29744468802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29744468802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.CCM.0000190619.42013.94
DO - 10.1097/01.CCM.0000190619.42013.94
M3 - Article
C2 - 16374169
AN - SCOPUS:29744468802
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 34
SP - 151
EP - 157
JO - Critical Care Medicine
JF - Critical Care Medicine
IS - 1
ER -