Sigmoid perforation following radiation therapy in patients with cervical cancer

Objective. We describe the clinical presentation, evaluation, management, and outcome of patients experiencing sigmoid perforation following radiation therapy for cervical cancer. Methods. A database consisting of over 5000 patients with stage IB-IIIB cervix cancer treated between 1963 and 1992 revealed 35 patients with sigmoid perforation. Twenty-seven were diagnosed and managed at one institution, and they form the study group. Results. The median age at the time of perforation was 50 years, and the median follow-up care was 78 months (range 6-396). The median time from completion of radiotherapy to perforation was 13 months (range 3-98). The mean interval from the first documented complaint to the index admission was 90 days. Nine (33%) of 27 patients were treated with high-dose radiation therapy. The most common complaint was abdominal pain in 25 (93%) patients, nausea occurred in 12 (44%) patients, weight loss in 12 (44%) patients, and vomiting in 10 (37%) patients. The pain was described as mild in 16 (73%) of 22 patients. Only 5 (18.5%) of 27 patients had physical signs of acute peritonitis, 8 (30%) of 27 patients had some form of tenderness, and 11 (41%) of 27 had a benign exam. A total of 20 (74%) patients had an abdominal radiograph, and 12 (44%) patients had a contrast enema for evaluation. Evidence of perforation was present in 5 (25%) of 20 plain abdominal radiographs and 1 (8%) of 12 contrast enemas. Following admission, 17 (63%) patients were observed initially with subsequent surgery after symptoms either failed to resolve or worsened. The median duration under observation was 4 days (range 1-23). Surgery was performed immediately in 8 patients (30%), and 2 (7%) were observed without operation. In these 2 patients, perforation was diagnosed postmortem. Seventeen (68%) of 25 patients had a localized abscess. Three of the patients who underwent immediate exploration and 7 who had surgery after a period of observation died postoperatively (10/25, 40%). Five (55%) of 9 patients in the group who received high-dose radiation therapy died because of sigmoid perforation. When the time frame of presentation was evaluated, we noted that 10 (50%) of 20 patients died between 1960 and 1979 and 1 (14%) of 7 died between 1980 and 1992. Conclusions. Sigmoid perforation following pelvic radiation for cervical cancer does not usually present with the typical signs of a ruptured viscus. A high degree of suspicion remains a priority in the care of radiated patients who present with abdominal pain given the atypical presentation of perforation in this group.