TY - JOUR
T1 - Sequential Proximal Optimizing Technique in Provisional Bifurcation Stenting With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold
T2 - Fractal Coronary Bifurcation Bench for Comparative Test Between Absorb and XIENCE Xpedition
AU - Derimay, François
AU - Souteyrand, Géraud
AU - Motreff, Pascal
AU - Guerin, Patrice
AU - Pilet, Paul
AU - Ohayon, Jacques
AU - Darremont, Olivier
AU - Rioufol, Gilles
AU - Finet, Gérard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2016/7/11
Y1 - 2016/7/11
N2 - Objectives The aim of this fractal bifurcation bench study was to compare provisional bifurcation stenting with a “re-POT” sequence, comprising a proximal optimizing technique (POT), side branch inflation, and final POT, between a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) and a metallic stent. Background Re-POT proved significantly better than kissing balloon inflation in maintaining circular geometry without overstretch in metal stents, while significantly reducing side branch ostium strut obstruction and global strut malapposition. This should be useful for BVSs, which are more easily breakable. Methods Twenty left main–like and 20 left anterior descending–like fractal coronary bifurcation bench models used 10 each 2.5 × 24 mm and 3.5 × 24 mm Absorb (Ab) BVSs and 10 each 2.5 × 24 mm and 3.5 × 24 mm XIENCE Xpedition (XX) metal stents, implanted by re-POT, with optical coherence tomographic analysis at each step and micro–computed tomographic analysis of Ab devices to detect strut fracture. Results With Ab devices, re-POT reduced percentage strut malapposition close to XX rates (0.8 ± 0.7% vs. 0.0 ± 0.0%, p < 0.05; 3.5 ± 1.7% vs. 0.3 ± 0.6%, p < 0.05), conserving proximal circularity (elliptical ratio, 1.04 vs. 1.03 and 1.04 vs. 1.04; p = NS). Mean post-re-POT proximal expansion was 0.6 ± 0.1 mm (+21.6 ± 2.1%) for 2.5-mm and 1.0 ± 0.1 mm (+23.6 ± 2.2%) for 3.5-mm Ab devices, with only 1 strut fracture (left anterior descending–like bench). Side branch ostium strut obstruction was greater with Ab scaffolds than XX stents: 41.1 ± 9.4% versus 16.4 ± 8.1% (p < 0.05) and 31.8 ± 3.2% versus 10.0 ± 5.3% (p < 0.05), respectively, for 2.5- and 3.5-mm scaffolds and stents. Ab scaffolds showed 2 ± 1% moderate but significant late recoil as of 1 h, reaching 4 ± 2% by 24 h (p < 0.05). Conclusions Re-POT optimized most Ab provisional bifurcation treatments, without fracture, respecting fractal geometry, and without exceeding 1.0-mm proximal differential diameter.
AB - Objectives The aim of this fractal bifurcation bench study was to compare provisional bifurcation stenting with a “re-POT” sequence, comprising a proximal optimizing technique (POT), side branch inflation, and final POT, between a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) and a metallic stent. Background Re-POT proved significantly better than kissing balloon inflation in maintaining circular geometry without overstretch in metal stents, while significantly reducing side branch ostium strut obstruction and global strut malapposition. This should be useful for BVSs, which are more easily breakable. Methods Twenty left main–like and 20 left anterior descending–like fractal coronary bifurcation bench models used 10 each 2.5 × 24 mm and 3.5 × 24 mm Absorb (Ab) BVSs and 10 each 2.5 × 24 mm and 3.5 × 24 mm XIENCE Xpedition (XX) metal stents, implanted by re-POT, with optical coherence tomographic analysis at each step and micro–computed tomographic analysis of Ab devices to detect strut fracture. Results With Ab devices, re-POT reduced percentage strut malapposition close to XX rates (0.8 ± 0.7% vs. 0.0 ± 0.0%, p < 0.05; 3.5 ± 1.7% vs. 0.3 ± 0.6%, p < 0.05), conserving proximal circularity (elliptical ratio, 1.04 vs. 1.03 and 1.04 vs. 1.04; p = NS). Mean post-re-POT proximal expansion was 0.6 ± 0.1 mm (+21.6 ± 2.1%) for 2.5-mm and 1.0 ± 0.1 mm (+23.6 ± 2.2%) for 3.5-mm Ab devices, with only 1 strut fracture (left anterior descending–like bench). Side branch ostium strut obstruction was greater with Ab scaffolds than XX stents: 41.1 ± 9.4% versus 16.4 ± 8.1% (p < 0.05) and 31.8 ± 3.2% versus 10.0 ± 5.3% (p < 0.05), respectively, for 2.5- and 3.5-mm scaffolds and stents. Ab scaffolds showed 2 ± 1% moderate but significant late recoil as of 1 h, reaching 4 ± 2% by 24 h (p < 0.05). Conclusions Re-POT optimized most Ab provisional bifurcation treatments, without fracture, respecting fractal geometry, and without exceeding 1.0-mm proximal differential diameter.
KW - bioresorbable vascular scaffold
KW - coronary bifurcation
KW - polymeric stent
KW - provisional stenting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990829381&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990829381&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.021
DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 27388830
AN - SCOPUS:84990829381
SN - 1936-8798
VL - 9
SP - 1397
EP - 1406
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - 13
ER -