Selection of four surgical techniques in orthotopic liver transplantation

Xiaoshun He, Lin Wei Wu, Wei Qiang Ju, Qiang Tai, Ming Han, Dong Ping Wang, Xiao Feng Zhu, Jie Fu Huang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the advantages and disadvantages of four surgical techniques in orthotopic liver transplantation. Methods: A total of 135 adult recipients receiving cadaveric whole liver grafts were dividied into four groups according to the surgeries they received: group A (n=22) underwent classic orthotopic liver transplantation, group B (n = 79) underwent modified piggyback liver transplantation, group C (n = 18) underwent classical piggyback liver transplantation, and group D (n = 16) underwent modified classic orthotopic liver transplantation. The clinical data of these recipients were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The operation time, anhepatic time, and intra-operation bleeding volume among these four groups were significantly different (P < 0.05). The incidence of transient renal damage in group C was significantly lower than that in other groups (P < 0.05), while the complication rates and survival rates were not significantly different in the early stage after the operation. Conclusions: Surgery techniques should be carefully selected based on the individual patients's pre-operative condition. The modified classic orthotopic liver transplantation is a preferred technique for tumor patients or patients with surgical history of upper abdomen.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)426-429
Number of pages4
JournalActa Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2008

Keywords

  • Aurgical technique
  • Liver transplantation
  • Prognosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Selection of four surgical techniques in orthotopic liver transplantation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this