TY - JOUR
T1 - Selection bias
T2 - examining the feasibility, utility, and participant receptivity to incorporating simulation into the general surgery residency selection process
AU - Gardner, Aimee K
AU - Steffes, Christopher P
AU - Nepomnayshy, Dmitry
AU - Nicholas, Cate
AU - Widmann, Warren D
AU - Fitzgibbons, Shimae C
AU - Dunkin, Brian J
AU - Jones, Daniel B
AU - Paige, John T
N1 - Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/9/30
Y1 - 2016/9/30
N2 - BACKGROUND: Opportunities exist to revise the current residency selection process to capture desirable candidate competencies. We examined the extent to which components of the American College of Surgeons/Association for Surgical Education simulation-based medical student curriculum combined with a teamwork activity could be used as potential screening method.METHODS: Students participated in a workshop consisting of training/evaluation of knot tying, suturing, airway management, gowning/gloving, and teamwork. Surveys were given to medical students (MS) and faculty/resident/staff (FRS) to examine their opinions about the residency screening process, the most critical competencies to assess, and the effectiveness of each station for candidate evaluation.RESULTS: Communication (FRS, 4.86 ± .35; MS, 4.93 ± .26), leadership (FRS, 4.41 ± .80; MS, 4.5 ± .76), judgment (FRS, 4.62 ± .74; MS, 4.67 ± .62), professionalism (FRS, 4.64 ± .73; MS, 5.00 ± .00), integrity (FRS, 4.71 ± .78; MS, 4.87 ± .35), and grit/resilience (FRS, 4.71 ± .78; MS, 4.53 ± .74) were considered most valuable for candidate screening. The simulation-based curriculum for evaluation of residency candidates was rated lowest by both groups. Open response comments indicated positive perceptions of this process.CONCLUSIONS: Employing simulation to assess candidates may be most beneficial for examining nontechnical attributes. Future work should continue to explore this area.
AB - BACKGROUND: Opportunities exist to revise the current residency selection process to capture desirable candidate competencies. We examined the extent to which components of the American College of Surgeons/Association for Surgical Education simulation-based medical student curriculum combined with a teamwork activity could be used as potential screening method.METHODS: Students participated in a workshop consisting of training/evaluation of knot tying, suturing, airway management, gowning/gloving, and teamwork. Surveys were given to medical students (MS) and faculty/resident/staff (FRS) to examine their opinions about the residency screening process, the most critical competencies to assess, and the effectiveness of each station for candidate evaluation.RESULTS: Communication (FRS, 4.86 ± .35; MS, 4.93 ± .26), leadership (FRS, 4.41 ± .80; MS, 4.5 ± .76), judgment (FRS, 4.62 ± .74; MS, 4.67 ± .62), professionalism (FRS, 4.64 ± .73; MS, 5.00 ± .00), integrity (FRS, 4.71 ± .78; MS, 4.87 ± .35), and grit/resilience (FRS, 4.71 ± .78; MS, 4.53 ± .74) were considered most valuable for candidate screening. The simulation-based curriculum for evaluation of residency candidates was rated lowest by both groups. Open response comments indicated positive perceptions of this process.CONCLUSIONS: Employing simulation to assess candidates may be most beneficial for examining nontechnical attributes. Future work should continue to explore this area.
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.029
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 28029374
SN - 0002-9610
JO - American Journal of Surgery
JF - American Journal of Surgery
ER -