Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Secondary databases in gynecologic cancer research

Katherine Hicks-Courant, Emily Meichun Ko, Koji Matsuo, Alexander Melamed, Dimitrios Nasioudis, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Shitanshu Uppal, Jason D. Wright, Pedro T. Ramirez

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Observational and cohort studies using large databases have made important contributions to gynecologic oncology. Knowledge of the advantages and potential limitations of commonly used databases benefits both readers and reviewers. In this review, researchers familiar with National Cancer Database (NCDB), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER), SEER-Medicare, MarketScan, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), and Premier, describe each database, its included data, access, management, storage, highlights, and limitations. A better understanding of these commonly used datasets can help readers, reviewers, and researchers to more effectively interpret and apply study results, evaluate new research studies, and develop compelling and practice-changing research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1619-1629
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Volume34
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 7 2024

Keywords

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Retrospective Study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Secondary databases in gynecologic cancer research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this