Abstract
Observational and cohort studies using large databases have made important contributions to gynecologic oncology. Knowledge of the advantages and potential limitations of commonly used databases benefits both readers and reviewers. In this review, researchers familiar with National Cancer Database (NCDB), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER), SEER-Medicare, MarketScan, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), and Premier, describe each database, its included data, access, management, storage, highlights, and limitations. A better understanding of these commonly used datasets can help readers, reviewers, and researchers to more effectively interpret and apply study results, evaluate new research studies, and develop compelling and practice-changing research.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1619-1629 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | International Journal of Gynecological Cancer |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 7 2024 |
Keywords
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
- Costs and Cost Analysis
- Cross-Sectional Studies
- Retrospective Study
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Oncology
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Secondary databases in gynecologic cancer research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS