Screening for Prostate Cancer

Brian J. Miles, Michael W. Kattan, R. Brian Giesler, Mark Cowen

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a decision analysis, a problem is stated, assumptions concerning probabilities and utilities are made, and a conclusion is reached based on the results. If the reader agrees with the structure, assumptions, probabilities, and utilities of the analysis, then he or she must agree with its conclusion. For the clinician, the main challenge to accept any conclusions drawn from a decision analysis is to decide if the analysis mirrors reality. After reviewing the manuscript and supplement published by Dr Krahn and colleagues, we feel their analysis differs enough from reality to prevent us from drawing firm conclusions. Many of their assumptions and the references used to support them are controversial. For instance, we are uncomfortable formulating recommendations for millions of men based essentially on two articles: The study by Johansson et al of 223 selected Swedish men with cancer, and the 52 cancers detected in.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1173-1174
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume273
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1995

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Screening for Prostate Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this