TY - JOUR
T1 - Salvage treatments after focal therapy for prostate cancer – a comprehensive review
AU - Storino Ramacciotti, Lorenzo
AU - Abreu, Andre Luis
AU - Crouzet, Sébastien
AU - Macek, Petr
AU - Miles, Brian J.
AU - Horuz, Rahim
AU - Nunes-Carneiro, Diogo
AU - Stricker, Phillip
AU - Scionti, Stephen
AU - Laguna, M. Pilar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objective: To review the literature on salvage treatments after focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methods: A non-systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to March 15, 2024, for studies that assessed salvage treatment outcomes in patients with recurrent PCa after primary FT. Original prospective and retrospective studies with more than 10 patients were included. Reviews, editorial comments, conference abstracts, and studies focusing solely on whole-gland treatments were excluded. Results: Twenty-one studies with a total of 1012 patients were included. The most reported salvage treatments were salvage radical prostatectomy followed by re-do ablation therapy. Only one study evaluated salvage radiation therapy. Except for one prospective study, all studies were retrospective. Oncological outcomes showed acceptable biochemical recurrence rates. Functional outcomes varied, with significant impacts observed on erectile function across modalities, though continence rates were less impacted. Complications were generally low across all treatment options. Conclusion: Salvage treatment post-primary FT is feasible, safe, and has reasonable oncologic outcomes. However, significant declines in sexual function are common, while continence is comparatively less affected. The literature primarily consists of retrospective studies; hence, future research should focus on large-scale prospective evaluations to better define treatment protocols and improve patient outcomes.
AB - Objective: To review the literature on salvage treatments after focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methods: A non-systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to March 15, 2024, for studies that assessed salvage treatment outcomes in patients with recurrent PCa after primary FT. Original prospective and retrospective studies with more than 10 patients were included. Reviews, editorial comments, conference abstracts, and studies focusing solely on whole-gland treatments were excluded. Results: Twenty-one studies with a total of 1012 patients were included. The most reported salvage treatments were salvage radical prostatectomy followed by re-do ablation therapy. Only one study evaluated salvage radiation therapy. Except for one prospective study, all studies were retrospective. Oncological outcomes showed acceptable biochemical recurrence rates. Functional outcomes varied, with significant impacts observed on erectile function across modalities, though continence rates were less impacted. Complications were generally low across all treatment options. Conclusion: Salvage treatment post-primary FT is feasible, safe, and has reasonable oncologic outcomes. However, significant declines in sexual function are common, while continence is comparatively less affected. The literature primarily consists of retrospective studies; hence, future research should focus on large-scale prospective evaluations to better define treatment protocols and improve patient outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200110279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85200110279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41391-024-00875-3
DO - 10.1038/s41391-024-00875-3
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85200110279
SN - 1365-7852
JO - Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
JF - Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
ER -