TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and Feasibility of Argatroban, Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator, and Intra-Arterial Therapy in Stroke (ARTSS-IA Study)
AU - Berekashvili, Ketevan
AU - Soomro, Jazba
AU - Shen, Loren
AU - Misra, Vivek
AU - Chen, Peng R.
AU - Blackburn, Spiros
AU - Dannenbaum, Mark
AU - Grotta, James C.
AU - Barreto, Andrew D.
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosures: AB reports grants from NIH and other from DHFSRF to UTHSC and JG reports grants from NINDS, other from DHFSRF, during study conduct.
Funding Information:
This study was supported by NIH grants P50NS044227 , T32NS07412 , UL1 RR024148 (TL1 RR024147 for the T32 program; KL2 RR0224149 for the K12 program), and Diane and Harold Farb Stroke Research Fund (DHFSRF) to UTHSC. Glaxo-Smith-Kline Inc. provided study medication without charge. Funders and medication suppliers had no role in study design, analysis, or writing.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - Background: A randomized trial of concurrent recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) + thrombin-inhibition with Argatroban in stroke patients recently demonstrated safety and signal of efficacy compared to r-tPA alone, but patients having endovascular therapy (EVT) were excluded. The current study intended to study feasibility and safety of concurrent r-tPA and Argatroban in patients undergoing EVT. Methods: We conducted a single-arm, feasibility, and safety study of patients that received standard-dose r-tPA, had intracranial large vessel occlusions, and underwent EVT within 6 hours of stroke onset. During r-tPA, a 100 μg/kg Argatroban bolus, followed by 12-hour infusion, targeted an activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) 2.25 timesbaseline. Feasibility was defined as ability to combine treatments without EVT time-metric delays, compared to cotemporaneous r-tPA + EVT treatments. Safety was incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), systemic hemorrhage, or EVT complications. Results: All preplanned 10 patients were enrolled. Arterial occlusions were middle cerebral artery (n = 8), internal carotid artery (n = 1), and posterior cerebral artery (n = 1). All received Argatroban before EVT and completed infusions. There were no delays in time-metrics compared to nonstudy patients during the same period. Nine patients achieved excellent angiographic reperfusion (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Ischemia [TICI] ≥2b); with 7 complete (TICI = 3). There were no sICH, systemic hemorrhage, or EVT complications. At 90 days, 6 (60%) patients had a modified Rankin Scale of 0-2 and none died. Conclusions: In patients treated with r-tPA and EVT, concomitant Argatroban is feasible, does not delay EVT provision, produces high rates of recanalization, is probably safe, and warrants further study.
AB - Background: A randomized trial of concurrent recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) + thrombin-inhibition with Argatroban in stroke patients recently demonstrated safety and signal of efficacy compared to r-tPA alone, but patients having endovascular therapy (EVT) were excluded. The current study intended to study feasibility and safety of concurrent r-tPA and Argatroban in patients undergoing EVT. Methods: We conducted a single-arm, feasibility, and safety study of patients that received standard-dose r-tPA, had intracranial large vessel occlusions, and underwent EVT within 6 hours of stroke onset. During r-tPA, a 100 μg/kg Argatroban bolus, followed by 12-hour infusion, targeted an activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) 2.25 timesbaseline. Feasibility was defined as ability to combine treatments without EVT time-metric delays, compared to cotemporaneous r-tPA + EVT treatments. Safety was incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), systemic hemorrhage, or EVT complications. Results: All preplanned 10 patients were enrolled. Arterial occlusions were middle cerebral artery (n = 8), internal carotid artery (n = 1), and posterior cerebral artery (n = 1). All received Argatroban before EVT and completed infusions. There were no delays in time-metrics compared to nonstudy patients during the same period. Nine patients achieved excellent angiographic reperfusion (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Ischemia [TICI] ≥2b); with 7 complete (TICI = 3). There were no sICH, systemic hemorrhage, or EVT complications. At 90 days, 6 (60%) patients had a modified Rankin Scale of 0-2 and none died. Conclusions: In patients treated with r-tPA and EVT, concomitant Argatroban is feasible, does not delay EVT provision, produces high rates of recanalization, is probably safe, and warrants further study.
KW - acute stroke
KW - anticoagulation
KW - argatroban
KW - embolectomy
KW - thrombectomy
KW - thrombolysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053763502&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053763502&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.08.036
DO - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.08.036
M3 - Article
C2 - 30249518
AN - SCOPUS:85053763502
SN - 1052-3057
VL - 27
SP - 3647
EP - 3651
JO - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
JF - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
IS - 12
ER -