TY - JOUR
T1 - Robust stability of melatonin circadian phase, sleep metrics, and chronotype across months in young adults living in real-world settings
AU - McHill, Andrew W.
AU - Sano, Akane
AU - Hilditch, Cassie J.
AU - Barger, Laura K.
AU - Czeisler, Charles A.
AU - Picard, Rosalind
AU - Klerman, Elizabeth B.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the participants and Center for Clinical Investigation staff for their support in conducting these studies. This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (Dr McHill was supported in part by K01HL146992, F32DK107146, and T32HL007901; Drs. Barger and Czeisler were supported in part by R01OH011773 and Dr Barger by R01AG044416; Dr Klerman was supported in part by K24HL105664, R01HL114088, R01GM105018, R01HL128538, and P01AG009975; Drs. Sano and Picard were supported in part by R01GM105018; NIH grant 1UL1 TR001102-01, 8UL1TR000170-05, UL1 RR 025758, Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Appropriate synchronization of the timing of behaviors with the circadian clock and adequate sleep are both important for almost every physiological process. The timing of the circadian clock relative to social (ie, local) clock time and the timing of sleep can vary greatly among individuals. Whether the timing of these processes is stable within an individual is not well-understood. We examined the stability of circadian-controlled melatonin timing, sleep timing, and their interaction across ~ 100 days in 15 students at a single university. At three time points ~ 35-days apart, circadian timing was determined from the dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO). Sleep behaviors (timing and duration) and chronotype (ie, mid-sleep time on free days corrected for sleep loss on school/work days) were determined via actigraphy and analyzed in ~ 1-month bins. Melatonin timing was stable, with an almost perfect relationship strength as determined via intraclass correlation coefficients ([ICC]=0.85); average DLMO timing across all participants only changed from the first month by 21 minutes in month 2 and 5 minutes in month 3. Sleep behaviors also demonstrated high stability, with ICC relationship strengths ranging from substantial to almost perfect (ICCs = 0.65-0.85). Average DLMO was significantly associated with average chronotype (r2 = 0.53, P <.01), with chronotype displaying substantial stability across months (ICC = 0.61). These findings of a robust stability in melatonin timing and sleep behaviors in young adults living in real-world settings holds promise for a better understanding of the reliability of previous cross-sectional reports and for the future individualized strategies to combat circadian-associated disease and impaired safety (ie, “chronomedicine”).
AB - Appropriate synchronization of the timing of behaviors with the circadian clock and adequate sleep are both important for almost every physiological process. The timing of the circadian clock relative to social (ie, local) clock time and the timing of sleep can vary greatly among individuals. Whether the timing of these processes is stable within an individual is not well-understood. We examined the stability of circadian-controlled melatonin timing, sleep timing, and their interaction across ~ 100 days in 15 students at a single university. At three time points ~ 35-days apart, circadian timing was determined from the dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO). Sleep behaviors (timing and duration) and chronotype (ie, mid-sleep time on free days corrected for sleep loss on school/work days) were determined via actigraphy and analyzed in ~ 1-month bins. Melatonin timing was stable, with an almost perfect relationship strength as determined via intraclass correlation coefficients ([ICC]=0.85); average DLMO timing across all participants only changed from the first month by 21 minutes in month 2 and 5 minutes in month 3. Sleep behaviors also demonstrated high stability, with ICC relationship strengths ranging from substantial to almost perfect (ICCs = 0.65-0.85). Average DLMO was significantly associated with average chronotype (r2 = 0.53, P <.01), with chronotype displaying substantial stability across months (ICC = 0.61). These findings of a robust stability in melatonin timing and sleep behaviors in young adults living in real-world settings holds promise for a better understanding of the reliability of previous cross-sectional reports and for the future individualized strategies to combat circadian-associated disease and impaired safety (ie, “chronomedicine”).
KW - Circadian rhythm/ physiology
KW - Human
KW - Melatonin / biosynthesis
KW - Melatonin / metabolism
KW - Saliva / metabolism
KW - Sleep / physiology
KW - Time factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101458064&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101458064&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jpi.12720
DO - 10.1111/jpi.12720
M3 - Article
C2 - 33523499
AN - SCOPUS:85101458064
SN - 0742-3098
VL - 70
JO - Journal of Pineal Research
JF - Journal of Pineal Research
IS - 3
M1 - e12720
ER -