TY - JOUR
T1 - Robotic level III inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy
T2 - Initial series
AU - Gill, Inderbir S.
AU - Metcalfe, Charles
AU - Abreu, Andre
AU - Duddalwar, Vinay
AU - Chopra, Sameer
AU - Cunningham, Mark
AU - Thangathurai, Duraiyah
AU - Ukimura, Osamu
AU - Satkunasivam, Raj
AU - Hung, Andrew
AU - Papalia, Rocco
AU - Aron, Monish
AU - Desai, Mihir
AU - Gallucci, Michele
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
PY - 2015/10/1
Y1 - 2015/10/1
N2 - Purpose Level III inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy for renal cancer is one of the most challenging open urologic oncology surgeries. We present the initial series of completely intracorporeal robotic level III inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy. Materials and Methods Nine patients underwent robotic level III inferior vena cava thrombectomy and 7 patients underwent level II thrombectomy. The entire operation (high intrahepatic inferior vena cava control, caval exclusion, tumor thrombectomy, inferior vena cava repair, radical nephrectomy, retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy) was performed exclusively robotically. To minimize the chances of intraoperative inferior vena cava thrombus embolization, an "inferior vena cava-first, kidney-last" robotic technique was developed. Data were accrued prospectively. Results All 16 robotic procedures were successful, without open conversion or mortality. For level III cases (9), median primary kidney (right 6, left 3) cancer size was 8.5 cm (range 5.3 to 10.8) and inferior vena cava thrombus length was 5.7 cm (range 4 to 7). Median operative time was 4.9 hours (range 4.5 to 6.3), estimated blood loss was 375 cc (range 200 to 7,000) and hospital stay was 4.5 days. All surgical margins were negative. There were no intraoperative complications and 1 postoperative complication (Clavien 3b). At a median 7 months of followup (range 1 to 18) all patients are alive. Compared to level II thrombi the level III cohort trended toward greater inferior vena cava thrombus length (3.3 vs 5.7 cm), operative time (4.5 vs 4.9 hours) and blood loss (290 vs 375 cc). Conclusions With appropriate patient selection, surgical planning and robotic experience, completely intracorporeal robotic level III inferior vena cava thrombectomy is feasible and can be performed efficiently. Larger experience, longer followup and comparison with open surgery are needed to confirm these initial outcomes.
AB - Purpose Level III inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy for renal cancer is one of the most challenging open urologic oncology surgeries. We present the initial series of completely intracorporeal robotic level III inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy. Materials and Methods Nine patients underwent robotic level III inferior vena cava thrombectomy and 7 patients underwent level II thrombectomy. The entire operation (high intrahepatic inferior vena cava control, caval exclusion, tumor thrombectomy, inferior vena cava repair, radical nephrectomy, retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy) was performed exclusively robotically. To minimize the chances of intraoperative inferior vena cava thrombus embolization, an "inferior vena cava-first, kidney-last" robotic technique was developed. Data were accrued prospectively. Results All 16 robotic procedures were successful, without open conversion or mortality. For level III cases (9), median primary kidney (right 6, left 3) cancer size was 8.5 cm (range 5.3 to 10.8) and inferior vena cava thrombus length was 5.7 cm (range 4 to 7). Median operative time was 4.9 hours (range 4.5 to 6.3), estimated blood loss was 375 cc (range 200 to 7,000) and hospital stay was 4.5 days. All surgical margins were negative. There were no intraoperative complications and 1 postoperative complication (Clavien 3b). At a median 7 months of followup (range 1 to 18) all patients are alive. Compared to level II thrombi the level III cohort trended toward greater inferior vena cava thrombus length (3.3 vs 5.7 cm), operative time (4.5 vs 4.9 hours) and blood loss (290 vs 375 cc). Conclusions With appropriate patient selection, surgical planning and robotic experience, completely intracorporeal robotic level III inferior vena cava thrombectomy is feasible and can be performed efficiently. Larger experience, longer followup and comparison with open surgery are needed to confirm these initial outcomes.
KW - inferior
KW - robotics
KW - thrombectomy
KW - vena cava
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941599562&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941599562&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.119
DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.119
M3 - Article
C2 - 25858419
AN - SCOPUS:84941599562
SN - 0022-5347
VL - 194
SP - 929
EP - 938
JO - Journal of Urology
JF - Journal of Urology
IS - 4
ER -