Abstract
Robot-assisted devices are becoming a popular alternative to manual facilitation in stroke rehabilitation. These devices have the potential to reduce therapist burden and treatment costs; however, their effectiveness in terms of functional recovery remains in question. This pilot study compared the outcomes of a stroke rehabilitation program that incorporates robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) with a more traditional therapy program that does not. Twenty hemiparetic stroke patients were recruited at a rehabilitation hospital in Houston, Texas, and were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The control group (n = 10) received 24 1-hour sessions of conventional physical therapy, whereas the RAGT group (n = 10) received 24 1-hour sessions of conventional physical therapy combined with RAGT on a treadmill. Gait function was assessed before and after treatment by an 8-m walk test, a 3-minute walk test, and the Tinetti balance assessment. Both groups showed significant improvement in all 3 outcome measures following treatment (P < .05), but there was no difference between groups. It is concluded that RAGT may provide improvements in balance and gait comparable with conventional physical therapy. A larger multicenter trial is required to investigate the effectiveness of RAGT in hemiparetic stroke.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 269-276 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2011 |
Keywords
- gait
- hemiparesis
- robot-assisted training
- stroke
- treadmill training
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Neurology
- Rehabilitation
- Community and Home Care