Abstract
Background: Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) were the first class of modern antidepressants; however, they are under-utilized as compared to the newer antidepressants. Methods: In this systematic review, network meta-analysis was used to investigate the comparative efficacy and acceptability of MAOIs for depressive disorders. Overall, the network meta-analysis included 52 double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared 14 antidepressants or placebo. Across studies, the mean arm size was n = 58 participants from a total N = 6462 (5309 active drug; 1153 placebo). Results: Except fluvoxamine, all antidepressants demonstrated superior efficacy to placebo, and none demonstrated substantially better or worse all-cause dropout rates. Phenelzine demonstrated superior evidence for efficacy compared to all other treatments, and clomipramine demonstrated superior evidence for acceptability compared to all other treatments. Limitations: The study is primarily limited by low estimate precision due to a relative paucity of studies for some of the included treatment conditions. Further evidence is required to study the relative efficacy of MAOIs against newer antidepressants. Conclusions: The results of this analysis largely support the re-evaluation of the use of MAOIs as antidepressant agents in the treatment algorithm of depression.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1153-1160 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Affective Disorders |
| Volume | 282 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1 2021 |
Keywords
- Anti-depressants
- MAOI
- Monoamine oxidase inhibitors
- Network meta-analysis
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting monoamine oxidase inhibitors for the treatment of depressive disorders: A systematic review and network meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS