Reply to "comment on 'Negative temperature of vortex motion'"

V. Berdichevsky, I. Kunin, F. Hussain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


We respond to the questions raised in the preceding Comment [K. O'Neil and L. J. Campbell, Phys. Rev. A 47, 2966 (1993)]. We explain why our statement "vortex temperature is always positive" is equivalent to the "opposite" statement in the Comment: "vortex temperature is always negative," and why we viewed the negative temperature states as paradoxical. We discuss also the notion of temperature for the limit case of infinite number of vortices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2968-2969
Number of pages2
JournalPhysical Review E
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1993

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Condensed Matter Physics


Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to "comment on 'Negative temperature of vortex motion'"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this