TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiation proctopathy in the treatment of prostate cancer
AU - Garg, Amit K.
AU - Mai, Wei Yuan
AU - McGary, John E.
AU - Grant, Walter H.
AU - Butler, Edward Brian
AU - Teh, Bin S.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank Shirley Clark for her assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. Dr. Teh is the recipient of a Methodist Hospital Research Institute research grant.
Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006/12/1
Y1 - 2006/12/1
N2 - Purpose: To compile and review data on radiation proctopathy in the treatment of prostate cancer with respect to epidemiology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, risk factors, and treatment. Methods: Medical literature databases including PubMed and Medline were screened for pertinent reports, and critically analyzed for relevance in the scope of our purpose. Results: Rectal toxicity as a complication of radiotherapy has received attention over the past decade, especially with the advent of dose-escalation in prostate cancer treatment. A number of clinical criteria help to define acute and chronic radiation proctopathy, but lack of a unified grading scale makes comparing studies difficult. A variety of risk factors, related to either radiation delivery or patient, are the subject of intense study. Also, a variety of treatment options, including medical therapy, endoscopic treatments, and surgery have shown varied results, but a lack of large randomized trials evaluating their efficacy prevents forming concrete recommendations. Conclusion: Radiation proctopathy should be an important consideration for the clinician in the treatment of prostate cancer especially with dose escalation. With further study of possible risk factors, the advent of a standardized grading scale, and more randomized trials to evaluate treatments, patients and physicians will be better armed to make appropriate management decisions.
AB - Purpose: To compile and review data on radiation proctopathy in the treatment of prostate cancer with respect to epidemiology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, risk factors, and treatment. Methods: Medical literature databases including PubMed and Medline were screened for pertinent reports, and critically analyzed for relevance in the scope of our purpose. Results: Rectal toxicity as a complication of radiotherapy has received attention over the past decade, especially with the advent of dose-escalation in prostate cancer treatment. A number of clinical criteria help to define acute and chronic radiation proctopathy, but lack of a unified grading scale makes comparing studies difficult. A variety of risk factors, related to either radiation delivery or patient, are the subject of intense study. Also, a variety of treatment options, including medical therapy, endoscopic treatments, and surgery have shown varied results, but a lack of large randomized trials evaluating their efficacy prevents forming concrete recommendations. Conclusion: Radiation proctopathy should be an important consideration for the clinician in the treatment of prostate cancer especially with dose escalation. With further study of possible risk factors, the advent of a standardized grading scale, and more randomized trials to evaluate treatments, patients and physicians will be better armed to make appropriate management decisions.
KW - Dose escalation
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Radiation proctopathy
KW - Radiotherapy
KW - Rectal toxicity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751198942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751198942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.1386
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.1386
M3 - Article
C2 - 17126204
AN - SCOPUS:33751198942
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 66
SP - 1294
EP - 1305
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 5
ER -