TY - JOUR
T1 - Proton Beam Therapy for Pancreatic Tumors
T2 - A Consensus Statement from the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Gastrointestinal Subcommittee
AU - Chhabra, Arpit M.
AU - Amos, Richard A.
AU - Simone, Charles B.
AU - Kaiser, Adeel
AU - Perles, Luis A.
AU - Giap, Huan
AU - Hallemeier, Christopher L.
AU - Johnson, Jedediah E.
AU - Lin, Haibo
AU - Wroe, Andrew J.
AU - Diffenderfer, Eric S.
AU - Wolfgang, John A.
AU - Sakurai, Hideyuki
AU - Lu, Hsiao Ming
AU - Hong, Theodore S.
AU - Koay, Eugene J.
AU - Terashima, Kazuki
AU - Vitek, Pavel
AU - Rule, William G.
AU - Apisarnthanarax, Smith Jim
AU - Badiyan, Shahed N.
AU - Molitoris, Jason K.
AU - Chuong, Michael
AU - Nichols, Romaine C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Radiation therapy manages pancreatic cancer in various settings; however, the proximity of gastrointestinal (GI) luminal organs at risk (OARs) poses challenges to conventional radiation therapy. Proton beam therapy (PBT) may reduce toxicities compared to photon therapy. This consensus statement summarizes PBT's safe and optimal delivery for pancreatic tumors. Our group has specific expertise using PBT for GI indications and has developed expert recommendations for treating pancreatic tumors with PBT. Computed tomography (CT) simulation: Patients should be simulated supine (arms above head) with custom upper body immobilization. For stomach/duodenum filling consistency, patients should restrict oral intake within 3 hours before simulation/treatments. Fiducial markers may be implanted for image guidance; however, their design and composition require scrutiny. The reconstruction field-of-view should encompass all immobilization devices at the target level (CT slice thickness 2-3 mm). Four-dimensional CT should quantify respiratory motion and guide motion mitigation. Respiratory gating is recommended when motion affects OAR sparing or reduces target coverage. Treatment planning: Beam-angle selection factors include priority OAR-dose minimization, water-equivalent-thickness stability along the beam path, and enhanced relative biological effect consideration due to the increased linear energy transfer at the proton beam end-of-range. Posterior and right-lateral beam angles that avoid traversing GI luminal structures are preferred (minimizing dosimetric impacts of variable anatomies). Pencil beam scanning techniques should use robust optimization. Single-field optimization is preferable to increase robustness, but if OAR constraints cannot be met, multifield optimization may be used. Treatment delivery: Volumetric image guidance should be used daily. CT scans should be acquired ad hoc as necessary (at minimum every other week) to assess the dosimetric impacts of anatomy changes. Adaptive replanning should be performed as required. Our group has developed recommendations for delivering PBT to safely and effectively manage pancreatic tumors.
AB - Radiation therapy manages pancreatic cancer in various settings; however, the proximity of gastrointestinal (GI) luminal organs at risk (OARs) poses challenges to conventional radiation therapy. Proton beam therapy (PBT) may reduce toxicities compared to photon therapy. This consensus statement summarizes PBT's safe and optimal delivery for pancreatic tumors. Our group has specific expertise using PBT for GI indications and has developed expert recommendations for treating pancreatic tumors with PBT. Computed tomography (CT) simulation: Patients should be simulated supine (arms above head) with custom upper body immobilization. For stomach/duodenum filling consistency, patients should restrict oral intake within 3 hours before simulation/treatments. Fiducial markers may be implanted for image guidance; however, their design and composition require scrutiny. The reconstruction field-of-view should encompass all immobilization devices at the target level (CT slice thickness 2-3 mm). Four-dimensional CT should quantify respiratory motion and guide motion mitigation. Respiratory gating is recommended when motion affects OAR sparing or reduces target coverage. Treatment planning: Beam-angle selection factors include priority OAR-dose minimization, water-equivalent-thickness stability along the beam path, and enhanced relative biological effect consideration due to the increased linear energy transfer at the proton beam end-of-range. Posterior and right-lateral beam angles that avoid traversing GI luminal structures are preferred (minimizing dosimetric impacts of variable anatomies). Pencil beam scanning techniques should use robust optimization. Single-field optimization is preferable to increase robustness, but if OAR constraints cannot be met, multifield optimization may be used. Treatment delivery: Volumetric image guidance should be used daily. CT scans should be acquired ad hoc as necessary (at minimum every other week) to assess the dosimetric impacts of anatomy changes. Adaptive replanning should be performed as required. Our group has developed recommendations for delivering PBT to safely and effectively manage pancreatic tumors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216005738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85216005738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.12.020
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.12.020
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85216005738
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 122
SP - 19
EP - 30
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 1
ER -