Problems in noninvasive imaging of pulmonary embolism

H. D. Sostman, S. Rapoport, M. G. Glickman, A. Gottschalk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

The current state of pulmonary embolism diagnosis is unsatisfactory to both the clinician and the imaging specialist. The ventilation-prefusion scintigram is the mainstay of current practice but requires sophisticated interpretation, produces too many indeterminate readings, and is not sufficiently specific. In addition to its inherent limitations, it suffers from a lack of prospective clinical evaluation: it is likely however, that this will be remedied over the next few years. A nearer-term improvement would be increased uniformity in diagnostic categorization and improved communication of the implications of such categorization to referring physicians. Perfusion scintigraphy will likely remain a primary screening examination. New modalities now being developed and evaluated are cause for hope that the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism can be made more specific. Such tehniques could also be useful in monitoring the adequacy of anticoagulant therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)759-774
Number of pages16
JournalRadiologic Clinics of North America
Volume21
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1983

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Problems in noninvasive imaging of pulmonary embolism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this