TY - JOUR
T1 - Pretransplantation soluble CD30 level as a predictor of acute rejection in kidney transplantation
T2 - A meta-analysis
AU - Chen, Yile
AU - Tai, Qiang
AU - Hong, Shaodong
AU - Kong, Yuan
AU - Shang, Yushu
AU - Liang, Wenhua
AU - Guo, Zhiyong
AU - He, Xiaoshun
PY - 2012/11/15
Y1 - 2012/11/15
N2 - BACKGROUND: The question of whether high pretransplantation soluble CD30 (sCD30) level can be a predictor of kidney transplant acute rejection (AR) is under debate. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis on the predictive efficacy of sCD30 for AR in renal transplantation. METHODS: PubMed (1966-2012), EMBASE (1988-2012), and Web of Science (1986-2012) databases were searched for studies concerning the predictive efficacy of sCD30 for AR after kidney transplantation. After a careful review of eligible studies, sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of the accuracy of sCD30 were pooled. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve was used to represent the overall test performance. RESULTS: Twelve studies enrolling 2507 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimates for pretransplantation sCD30 in prediction of allograft rejection risk were poor, with a sensitivity of 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66-0.74), a specificity of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.46-0.50), a positive likelihood ratio of 1.35 (95% CI, 1.20-1.53), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.55-0.84), and a diagnostic odds ratio of 2.07 (95% CI, 1.54-2.80). The area under curve of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.60, indicating poor overall accuracy of the serum sCD30 level in the prediction of patients at risk for AR. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the meta-analysis show that the accuracy of pretransplantation sCD30 for predicting posttransplantation AR was poor. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the usefulness of this test for identifying risks of AR in transplant recipients.
AB - BACKGROUND: The question of whether high pretransplantation soluble CD30 (sCD30) level can be a predictor of kidney transplant acute rejection (AR) is under debate. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis on the predictive efficacy of sCD30 for AR in renal transplantation. METHODS: PubMed (1966-2012), EMBASE (1988-2012), and Web of Science (1986-2012) databases were searched for studies concerning the predictive efficacy of sCD30 for AR after kidney transplantation. After a careful review of eligible studies, sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of the accuracy of sCD30 were pooled. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve was used to represent the overall test performance. RESULTS: Twelve studies enrolling 2507 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimates for pretransplantation sCD30 in prediction of allograft rejection risk were poor, with a sensitivity of 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66-0.74), a specificity of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.46-0.50), a positive likelihood ratio of 1.35 (95% CI, 1.20-1.53), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.55-0.84), and a diagnostic odds ratio of 2.07 (95% CI, 1.54-2.80). The area under curve of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.60, indicating poor overall accuracy of the serum sCD30 level in the prediction of patients at risk for AR. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the meta-analysis show that the accuracy of pretransplantation sCD30 for predicting posttransplantation AR was poor. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the usefulness of this test for identifying risks of AR in transplant recipients.
KW - Acute rejection
KW - Kidney transplantation
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Predictor
KW - sCD30
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869509306&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869509306&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TP.0b013e31826784ad
DO - 10.1097/TP.0b013e31826784ad
M3 - Article
C2 - 23052636
AN - SCOPUS:84869509306
SN - 0041-1337
VL - 94
SP - 911
EP - 918
JO - Transplantation
JF - Transplantation
IS - 9
ER -