TY - JOUR
T1 - Potentially inappropriate prescribing before and after nursing home admission among patients with and without dementia
AU - Zuckerman, Ilene H.
AU - Hernandez, Jose Josue
AU - Gruber-Baldini, Ann L.
AU - Hebel, J. Richard
AU - Stuart, Bruce
AU - Zimmerman, Sheryl
AU - Magaziner, Jay
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by grants from the Na tional Institute on Aging (R01 AG8211, R29AG11407, P60-AG12583, and K01-AG22011).
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2005/12
Y1 - 2005/12
N2 - Objectives: This study was designed to describe changes in the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicationprescribing before and after nursing home admission, and to compare prevalence among residents with and without dementia. This paper extends the research on inappropriate medication prescribing among residents entering a nursing home, with the added feature of comparison by dementia status. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from 59 randomly selected nursing homes in Maryland. Dually eligible (Medicare/Medicaid) residents aged ≥65 years who were admitted to one of these nursing homes from 1992 to 1995 were eligible for inclusion in the cohort. An expert panel of physicians determined dementia status at admission. Potentially inappropriate prescribing, as defined by the 1997 Beers criteria, was compared using Medicaid prescription claims for up to 12 months before and after admission to characterize monthly prescribing patterns. Results: The study group included 546 dually eligible nursing home residents with ≥1 paid prescription claim for the 12 months before or after their admission date. A total of 372 (68%) residents were white, 443 (81%) were unmarried, 408 (75%) were female, and 334 (61%) were diagnosed with dementia at admission. Before nursing home admission, the mean monthly prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications for residents with and without dementia was 20% and 23%, respectively. After admission, the mean monthly prevalence increased to 28% among residents without dementia and decreased to 19% among residents with dementia. After adjusting for the mean number of other prescriptions, sociodemographic factors, and number of comorbid conditions, residents with dementia were as likely as residents without dementia to receive a potentially inappropriate drug before admission (prevalence ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.58-1.62). After admission, residents with dementia were 27% less likely than residents without dementia to receive a potentially inappropriate drug, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (prevalence ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-1.01). Conclusions: Inappropriate medication prescribing was similar before nursing home admission among patients with and without dementia. After admission, the prevalence was lower among residents with dementia, but it did not reach statistical significance.
AB - Objectives: This study was designed to describe changes in the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicationprescribing before and after nursing home admission, and to compare prevalence among residents with and without dementia. This paper extends the research on inappropriate medication prescribing among residents entering a nursing home, with the added feature of comparison by dementia status. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from 59 randomly selected nursing homes in Maryland. Dually eligible (Medicare/Medicaid) residents aged ≥65 years who were admitted to one of these nursing homes from 1992 to 1995 were eligible for inclusion in the cohort. An expert panel of physicians determined dementia status at admission. Potentially inappropriate prescribing, as defined by the 1997 Beers criteria, was compared using Medicaid prescription claims for up to 12 months before and after admission to characterize monthly prescribing patterns. Results: The study group included 546 dually eligible nursing home residents with ≥1 paid prescription claim for the 12 months before or after their admission date. A total of 372 (68%) residents were white, 443 (81%) were unmarried, 408 (75%) were female, and 334 (61%) were diagnosed with dementia at admission. Before nursing home admission, the mean monthly prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications for residents with and without dementia was 20% and 23%, respectively. After admission, the mean monthly prevalence increased to 28% among residents without dementia and decreased to 19% among residents with dementia. After adjusting for the mean number of other prescriptions, sociodemographic factors, and number of comorbid conditions, residents with dementia were as likely as residents without dementia to receive a potentially inappropriate drug before admission (prevalence ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.58-1.62). After admission, residents with dementia were 27% less likely than residents without dementia to receive a potentially inappropriate drug, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (prevalence ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-1.01). Conclusions: Inappropriate medication prescribing was similar before nursing home admission among patients with and without dementia. After admission, the prevalence was lower among residents with dementia, but it did not reach statistical significance.
KW - Dementia
KW - Inappropriate prescribing
KW - Nursing home
KW - Quality of medication prescribing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33144481767&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33144481767&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2005.12.007
DO - 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2005.12.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 16503320
AN - SCOPUS:33144481767
VL - 3
SP - 246
EP - 254
JO - American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy
JF - American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy
SN - 1543-5946
IS - 4
ER -