Poststenotic signal loss in MR angiography: Effects of echo time, flow compensation, and fractional echo

A. J. Evans, D. B. Richardson, R. Tien, J. R. MacFall, L. W. Hedlund, E. R. Heinz, O. Boyko, Henry Dirk Sostman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations


PURPOSE: To evaluate with steady and pulsatile flow the Influence of echo time, gradient strength and duration, and flow compensation on the degree of turbulent signal loss, factors that have been implicated in MR angiography's overestimation of the degree of stenosis. METHODS: We examined poststenotic turbulent flow in two models, one that created a turbulent jet and another that simulated a plaque-like stenosis. The pulse sequence used in these experiments allowed for a single variable (flow compensation, echo time, or gradient strength) to be varied without changing the others. RESULTS: Poststenotic signal loss can lead to overestimation of the degree of a stenosis. The area of signal loss In the turbulent jet was influenced by fractional echo and flow compensation, but not by echo time. We found that the dominant mechanism in poststenotic signal loss is related to the strength and duration of the Imaging gradients. CONCLUSlONS: Flow-compensated sequences with reduced gradient strength and duration will reduce poststenotic signal loss and may lead to more accurate estimations of the extent of stenotic lesions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)721-729
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993


  • Artery magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)
  • Artery stenosis and occlusion
  • Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)
  • Magnetic resonance experimental

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology


Dive into the research topics of 'Poststenotic signal loss in MR angiography: Effects of echo time, flow compensation, and fractional echo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this