TY - JOUR
T1 - Postoperative Spinal Cord Ischemia Monitoring
T2 - A Review of Techniques Available after Endovascular Aortic Repair
AU - Soliman, Mostafa A.
AU - Ramadan, Alaa
AU - Shah, Anuj S.
AU - Corr, Stuart J.
AU - Abdelazeem, Basel
AU - Rahimi, Maham
N1 - Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Background: Spinal cord ischemia is one of the complications that can occur after open and endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic repair. This occurs despite various perioperative approaches, including distal aortic perfusion, hybrid procedures with extra anatomical bypasses, motor-evoked potential, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage. The inability to recognize spinal ischemia in a timely manner remains a devastating complication after thoracoabdominal aortic repair.This review aims to look at novel technologies that are designed for continuous monitoring to detect early changes that signal the development of spinal cord ischemia and to discuss their benefits and limitations. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the technologies available for continuous monitoring in the intensive care unit for early detection of spinal cord ischemia. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they used different technologies for monitoring spinal ischemia during the postoperative period. All articles that were not available in English were excluded. To ensure that all relevant articles were included, no other significant restrictions were imposed. Results: We identified 59 studies from the outset to December 2022 to be included in our study. New techniques have been studied as potentially useful monitoring tools that could provide simple and effective monitoring of the spinal cord. These include near-infrared spectroscopy, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, fiber optic monitoring of the spinal cord, and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. Conclusions: Despite the development of new techniques to monitor for postoperative spinal cord ischemia, their use remains limited. We recommend more future research to ensure rapid intervention for our patients.
AB - Background: Spinal cord ischemia is one of the complications that can occur after open and endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic repair. This occurs despite various perioperative approaches, including distal aortic perfusion, hybrid procedures with extra anatomical bypasses, motor-evoked potential, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage. The inability to recognize spinal ischemia in a timely manner remains a devastating complication after thoracoabdominal aortic repair.This review aims to look at novel technologies that are designed for continuous monitoring to detect early changes that signal the development of spinal cord ischemia and to discuss their benefits and limitations. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the technologies available for continuous monitoring in the intensive care unit for early detection of spinal cord ischemia. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they used different technologies for monitoring spinal ischemia during the postoperative period. All articles that were not available in English were excluded. To ensure that all relevant articles were included, no other significant restrictions were imposed. Results: We identified 59 studies from the outset to December 2022 to be included in our study. New techniques have been studied as potentially useful monitoring tools that could provide simple and effective monitoring of the spinal cord. These include near-infrared spectroscopy, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, fiber optic monitoring of the spinal cord, and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. Conclusions: Despite the development of new techniques to monitor for postoperative spinal cord ischemia, their use remains limited. We recommend more future research to ensure rapid intervention for our patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85197195609&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85197195609&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.03.022
DO - 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.03.022
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38815914
AN - SCOPUS:85197195609
SN - 0890-5096
VL - 106
SP - 438
EP - 466
JO - Annals of Vascular Surgery
JF - Annals of Vascular Surgery
ER -