Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex syndrome of end-organ hypoperfusion that requires timely and thorough decision making. While many pathophysiologic and technical principles have been delineated in this issue, the purpose of this case-based report is to reflect upon some of these principles in the context of real-life scenarios. Given the obvious lacuna of evidence-based recommendations in CS, the authors provide a rationale for their decision-making process. The first case is a young post-heart-transplant patient with graft failure who was in a state of biventricular failure and restrictive physiology and required acute mechanical circulatory support (MCS). The second case is a patient who suffered a mechanical complication after experiencing an acute myocardial infarction that required MCS.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 43-49 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- cardiogenic shock
- heart failure
- mechanical support devices
- pressure volume loop physiology
- Graft Rejection/diagnosis
- Ventricular Function, Left
- Humans
- Myocardial Infarction/complications
- Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/instrumentation
- Recovery of Function
- Young Adult
- Heart Failure/diagnosis
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
- Female
- Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis
- Heart-Assist Devices
- Models, Cardiovascular
- Risk Factors
- Cardiotonic Agents/therapeutic use
- Treatment Outcome
- Stroke Volume
- Heart Transplantation/adverse effects
- Aged
- Ventricular Pressure
- Ventricular Function, Right
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)