Physical oncology: A bench-to-bedside quantitative and predictive approach

Hermann B. Frieboes, Mark A J Chaplain, Alastair M. Thompson, Elaine L. Bearer, John S. Lowengrub, Vittorio Cristini

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cancer models relating basic science to clinical care in oncology may fail to address the nuances of tumor behavior and therapy, as in the case, discussed herein, of the complex multiscale dynamics leading to the often-observed enhanced invasiveness, paradoxically induced by the very antiangiogenic therapy designed to destroy the tumor. Studies would benefit from approaches that quantitatively link the multiple physical and temporal scales from molecule to tissue in order to offer outcome predictions for individual patients. Physical oncology is an approach that applies fundamental principles from the physical and biological sciences to explain certain cancer behaviors as observable characteristics arising from the underlying physical and biochemical events. For example, the transport of oxygen molecules through tissue affects phenotypic characteristics such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, and adhesion, which in turn underlie the patient-scale tumor growth and invasiveness. Our review of physical oncology illustrates how tumor behavior and treatment response may be a quantifiable function of marginally stable molecular and/or cellular conditions modulated by inhomogeneity. By incorporating patient-specific genomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and cellular data into multiscale physical models, physical oncology could complement current clinical practice through enhanced understanding of cancer behavior, thus potentially improving patient survival. Cancer

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)298-302
Number of pages5
JournalCancer research
Volume71
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Physical oncology: A bench-to-bedside quantitative and predictive approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this