Percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation may not be effective in severe angina: Commentary

Neal Kleiman; Debbie Singh

doi:10.1016/j.ebcm.2006.01.029

Percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation may not be effective in severe angina: Commentary

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	59-60
Number of pages	2
Journal	Evidence-based Cardiovascular Medicine
Volume	10
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebcm.2006.01.029
State	Published - Mar 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ebcm.2006.01.029

Cite this

@article{adfce97410df4e10aa08c7c4afa5f109,

title = "Percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation may not be effective in severe angina: Commentary",

author = "Neal Kleiman and Debbie Singh",

year = "2006",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1016/j.ebcm.2006.01.029",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "10",

pages = "59--60",

journal = "Evidence-based Cardiovascular Medicine",

issn = "1361-2611",

publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation may not be effective in severe angina

T2 - Commentary

AU - Kleiman, Neal

AU - Singh, Debbie

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33644810516

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644810516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ebcm.2006.01.029

DO - 10.1016/j.ebcm.2006.01.029

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 16530691

AN - SCOPUS:33644810516

SN - 1361-2611

VL - 10

SP - 59

EP - 60

JO - Evidence-based Cardiovascular Medicine

JF - Evidence-based Cardiovascular Medicine

IS - 1

ER -

Percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation may not be effective in severe angina: Commentary

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this