Percutaneous approaches for retrieval of an embolized or malpositioned left atrial appendage closure device: A multicenter experience

Muhammad R. Afzal, Christopher R. Ellis, James Gabriels, Mikhael El-Chami, Anish Amin, Zaher Fanari, David Delurgio, Roy M. John, Apoor Patel, Thomas A. Haldis, Jeffrey A. Goldstein, Steven Yakubov, Emile G. Daoud, John D. Hummel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Experience with retrieval of a Watchman left atrial (LA) appendage (LAA) closure device (WD) is limited. An embolized or grossly malpositioned WD warrants retrieval to minimize the risk of thromboembolic complications and vascular occlusion. Objective: The purpose of this study was to report approaches for percutaneous retrieval of a WD from multicenter experience. Methods: Data on successful WD retrievals were obtained from high-volume operators. Data included clinical characteristics; structural characteristics of the LA and LAA; and procedural details of the deployment and retrieval procedure, type of retrieval (immediate: during the same procedure; delayed: during a separate procedure after the successful deployment), equipment used, complications, and postretrieval management. Results: Ten successful percutaneous and 1 surgical retrievals comprised this study. Seven patients had immediate retrieval, while 4 had delayed retrieval. The median duration before delayed retrieval was 45 days (range 1–45 days). The median LAA diameter and size of a successfully deployed WD was 16 mm (range 14–24 mm) and 21 mm (range 21–30 mm), respectively. A WD was retrieved from the LA (n = 1), LAA (n = 2), left ventricle (n = 2), and aorta (n = 6). The reason for retrieval from the LAA was inadequate deployment, resulting in a significant peri-device leak. Retrieval from the LA or LAA was successfully performed using snares (n = 2) and a Raptor grasping device (n = 1). Retrieval from the left ventricle was achieved with a snare (n = 1) and surgery (n = 1). Retrieval from the aorta required snares (n = 5) and retrieval forceps (n = 1). Five patients were successfully reimplanted with a larger size WD. The only complication during percutaneous retrieval was a pseudoaneurysm. Conclusion: Retrieval of an embolized or malpositioned WD is feasible, and familiarity with snares and grasping tools can facilitate a successful removal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1545-1553
Number of pages9
JournalHeart Rhythm
Volume17
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2020

Keywords

  • Embolization
  • Foreign body retrieval
  • Grasping tool
  • Inadequate deployment
  • Retrieval
  • Snare

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Percutaneous approaches for retrieval of an embolized or malpositioned left atrial appendage closure device: A multicenter experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this